185

Politics

Party profile: Radikale

admin
October 26th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

According to Anna Mee Allerslev, Copenhagen’s diversity and green profile are strengths to be celebrated and expanded

After seeing their votes almost double during the last parliamentary election in 2011, national government coalition party Radikale is hoping that this will translate into a successful local election campaign this November.

The Copenhagen Post caught up with Radikale’s lead candidate and Copenhagen’s current deputy mayor for employment and integration, Anna Mee Allerslev, to hear about her party’s local election campaign platform and her goals for the city.

SEE ALSO: Party profile: Konservative

An international hub
It’s no secret that Copenhagen isn’t the best city in terms of welcoming and integrating its foreigners, and therefore a large part of Radikale’s focus is on the city’s international residents.

“None of the other parties have focused on the international agenda like we have,” Allerslev said.

Radikale wants to beef up International House in Copenhagen, the public-private partnership dedicated to helping immigrants settle in the city. The party also wants to provide more housing options for the city’s international students. An international public school in Copenhagen is also on the party’s agenda.

“We’re also striving for the English language to be the second official language here in the council. You should be able to get services in English wherever you go,” Allerslev said.

Allerslev believes that the city is moving in the right direction, but still has a long way to go.

“Because of the financial crisis, it is very difficult to tell our own citizens that we want to help the internationals, when it is clear that we are not doing enough for the Danes,” she said.

A greener, more diverse city
Although Allerslev argues that Copenhagen is a diverse city, she says the real question is what to do about it.

“We want the city to be more diverse and we want to have a lot of programmes and initiatives so that out diversity transforms into an advantage,” Allerslev said.

But it’s not just about ‘hard-core integration’. Soft initiatives are just as essential.

“We have some integration issues here, and of course we want to make better schools and daycares so that immigrants are properly integrated. But it’s not enough. We need to have positive programmes [like] culture and diversity festivals,” Allerslev said. “If immigrants don’t feel like they are a proper part of the city, we can never integrate them.”

And while Copenhagen remains one of the leading cities in the world when it comes to being ‘green’, Allersev says that here too there is room for improvement.

“We have always been a leading city when it comes to the green agenda – it’s one of the things that make Copenhagen a unique city,” Allerslev said. “A lot of it is about the bicycle culture, which Radikale has always been a leading force in.”

But Allerslev admitted that some of her constituents and colleagues feel that she hasn’t done enough to promote cycling.

“Four times a year public servants are paid to stand around the city spreading bicycling karma by handing out hearts and buns just to send a positive message,” Allerslev said. “I would rather use that money on bike lanes than those kinds of things. I support bicycles and the green agenda, but sometimes I think it can get too silly.”

Allerslev pointed to two cities that she hopes to emulate.

“I think we can do a lot more to be a green city, such as Vancouver, which is really green, with more trees and more grass in the city. Berlin is also better than we are in that respect. I would also like us to have more green areas, more parks and green roofs,” Allerslev said.

A party on the rise
At the 2011 parliamentary elections, Radikale almost doubled its voter numbers from 5.1 percent in 2007 to 9.5 percent – its best election result since 1973.

Allerslev is hoping for a similar success at the local level.

“We are among the smallest organisations, and we only have 350,000 kroner for the whole campaign,” Allerslev said. “Enhedslisten, for example, has 1.6 million kroner at its disposal. But, we hope we’re going to have a good election, and there are indications that we will, but you never know.”

Factfile | Anne Mee Allerslev

Party: Radikale
Age: 29
Years on the City Council: 4

 

Platform:
• Youth and education
• Diversity
• Green solutions
• Traffic and city development
• Employment and growth

Next week: Party profiles of Dansk Folkeparti and Socialistisk Folkeparti


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”