234

General

Party profile: Konservative

admin
October 26th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Rasmus Jarlov says the city should cater less to cannabis smokers and cyclists, and more to businesses and motorists

Rasmus Jarlov is worried about his city. As a member of the Copenhagen Ciity Council, and the Konservative mayoral candidate in the upcoming local election, Jarlov and his party want to bring city businesses and residents back into focus to stop what they see as the capital city’s dangerous decline in recent years.

“Copenhagen is very close to becoming the Nordic poorhouse,” he said, after a study ranked the city near the bottom in initiatives to encourage growth and jobs. “It is an economic disaster and a problem that affects not only Copenhagen, but has consequences for the entire country.”

SEE ALSO: Party profile: Radikale

Business neglected
Jarlov, 36, has been on the City Council since 2009. His experience in the business world created a strong desire to represent a sector that he feels is not being supported by the current government.

Jarlov said that businesses are driven away by the city’s high tax rates and excessive bureaucracy, which he says makes it difficult to run a business “other than a bicycle shop” in Copenhagen.

The taxes also discourage visitors to the city.

“Tourists are staying away from Copenhagen because of high taxes and prices and because excessive amounts of roadwork are rendering the city unattractive and difficult to navigate through,” he said.

Jarlov has been an outspoken critic of favouring bikes over cars in the city.

He has accused the members of the council of running what he called a “smear campaign” against car owners.

“They have demonised carpenters who need to transport their tools and others who need to use their cars for their jobs and their lives – all in the name of political correctness,” he said. “They keep blocking roads and cutting out more and more parking places, and businesses tell me that it is just one more thing that is hurting their ability to make a go of it.”

Against the mayor
Jarlov said that he and his party have been the most outspoken opponents of the administration of the current mayor, Frank Jensen (Socialdemokraterne) and that they will continue to do so.

“Copenhagen’s left-wing flatly refuses to lower taxes. Instead they continue to remove parking spaces and create bottlenecks on vital traffic arteries,” he said.
Jarlov also scoffed at the “extremely expensive” high-tech city bike programme being championed by the administration.

“Copenhagen is already the number one biking city in the world: anyone who wants a bike here knows how to find one and it is not up to government to solve every problem,” he said. “Sometimes people have to do things for themselves.”

No pot or cheap housing
Jarlov also expressed disdain for another of Jensen’s pet projects: legalising cannabis.

“The council spends time discussing whether parliament should legalise cannabis and it has absolutely nothing to do with City Hall politics,” he said. “It is a decision that will be made by parliament and it is a waste of time to discuss it rather than talking about how to create jobs, improve the standard of living and economic growth.”

Jarlov was also displeased with the city’s decision to set aside 200 million kroner to build 640 new family homes and 605 student homes in the coming years.

“The left will spend a fortune on building affordable housing for a small minority,” he said. “By doing so, they make housing more expensive for everyone else – both tenants and homeowners – by causing property taxes to rise.”

Jarlov said that the plan will only create “an endless cycle” by making it more expensive to live in Copenhagen, which in turn will create a need for even more cheap housing and another tax hike.

High hopes for Copenhagen
Although Konservative lost ground nationally in the last election, Jarlov said that the party has been gaining strength in Copenhagen.

“This election could be the first time in 40 years that we do better in Copenhagen than in the rest of the country,” he said.

 

Factfile | Rasmus Jarlov
Party: Konservative
Age: 36
Years on the City Council: 4

Platform:
• Lower taxes
• Less regulation
• More focus on business
• Stop “demonising” drivers
• Revive Copenhagen economically

Next week: Party profiles of Dansk Folkeparti and Socialistisk Folkeparti


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”