360

Politics

Communist. Cabinet member. National threat?

admin
November 13th, 2011


This article is more than 13 years old.

Opposition calling for investigation into business minister’s relationship with Moscow to establish if he is a security threat

 

Two decades after the fall of communism, Ole Sohn is finding himself at the centre of a plot worthy of a Cold War thriller. The conclusion of the business and growth ministerÂ’s real life plot, however, may just lie buried in archives that he himself closed to journalists two decades ago.

Sohn, now a member of parliament for theSocialistisk Folkeparti and a cabinet member since October, faced a barrage of questions this past week about the extent of his relationship to the former Soviet Union and whether he poses a security threat to Denmark.

Sohn, a former chairman of Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti (DKP), is being accused of accepting 5.2 million kroner in cash from Moscow on behalf of the party, money never declared to the tax authorities.

He denies ever accepting direct financial support from the Soviet Union, but if Sohn is lying, his political opponents argue, he presents a security risk. They reason that Russia, which may have evidence of SohnÂ’s complicity, could blackmail the business and growth minister for favourable trade deals in exchange for keeping quiet.

Moscow’s close relationship with the DKP – which Sohn led between 1987 and 1991 – is no secret. A 2001 book entitled ‘Guldet fra Moskva’ (The Gold from Moscow), outlined how former chairmen of the DKP, Jørgen Jensen and Knud Jespersen, both accepted cash via the KGB to support the party.

Nikolai Shatskikh, the KGBÂ’s man in Copenhagen in the late 1980s, as well as former DKP party secretary, Bo Rosschou, both confirmed the transactions in Jyllands-Posten newspaper last week.

Rosschou explained that former DKP chairman Jensen admitted to accepting large sums of cash shortly before his death in 1987. And Shatskikh explained how he would hand over the cash to top members of the DKP in his office in the Soviet embassy.

But Sohn denies ever meeting Shatskikh to receive cash, or of even knowing about the existence of the money, despite documents published in ‘Guldet fra Moskva’, leaked from within the Communist Party archive, that show an ‘O. Sohn’ signed off seven payments worth 5.2 million kroner.

Sohn has argued the money can be accounted for through indirect support the DKP received from Moscow in his time as chairman. This was done by deliberately overcharging them to print the party newspaper ‘Land & Folk’ at the party’s press Terpo Tryk.

“It’s obvious money was rolling in. Otherwise Land & Folk and Terpo Press couldn’t have existed,” he told B.T. tabloid last October, but adding he never handled any money. “I have never personally received a single krone. But it’s correct that the DKP received large quantities of money even while I was chairman.”

But SohnÂ’s political opponents believe he is lying and that he personally handled the money, something the Danish tax authorities would not take kindly to. So in an attempt to pin Sohn to the cash handovers, reporters from Jyllands-Posten travelled to Moscow to meet with Shatskikh to see if he could remember handing money to Sohn.

But they were out of luck. Shatskikh remembered handing over money in his office in the Soviet embassy to chairmen of the DKP until 1991, but he could not confirm whether Sohn ever accepted the money. Shatskikh did add that in principle, it must have been Sohn he handed the money over to, as that was protocol, but he could not recognise Sohn in a photograph.

Shatskikh explained that the protocol required that a receipt signed by the DKP chairman was returned to Moscow as proof of the transaction. If the journalists were to prove Sohn had handled the money, they needed to find the receipts.

With the Communist Party archive in Moscow closed to the public, the last remaining avenue of enquiry would be the DKP’s archives. And yet these archives are also off-limits. In 1989 Sohn transferred the DKP’s archives into the library of the Workers’ Museum, whose current archivist, Jesper Jørgensen, told radio station Radio 24syv this week that Sohn left strict instructions that journalists were not allowed access. This deal remains in place 21 years later.

Jørgensen has already denied access to Jyllands-Posten, Berlingske and B.T. newspapers, arguing it was never the point of the archive to be examined by journalists. But opposition parties, KonservativeVenstre and Dansk Folkeparti believe that as head of the largest labour-oriented party, Socialdemokraterne, PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt should open the archives.

I think it would natural that she opened up the archive in the name of the free press and ensure that everyone has access,” MP Søren Pind (Venstre) told Berlingske.

Thorning-Schmidt has not responded to the demand, instead choosing to voice her full support for beleaguered colleague. So with the doors to DKPÂ’s archive firmly shut, that might the end of the story. Except that Thorning-Schmidt promised during the election that investigations into party financing can be carried out if there is support of 40 percent of parliament.

The proposal was to ensure accountability of the majority by the minority, and has since been brought back to the table by both Enhedslisten and Dansk Folkeparti. And with Konservative, Venstre and Dansk Folkeparti all calling for an investigation, it has the support of 43 percent of parliament.

But not everyone in opposition thinks itÂ’s worth the effort. Simon Ammitzbøll from the Liberal Alliance stated in a press release that while “it is very likely Ole Sohn accepted money under the table from Moscow,” an investigation would be a waste of time.

“As business minister he can do far more damage now than he could as chair of the DKP. We would rather concentrate on presenting the damaging effects of Sohn’s policies today,” Ammitzbøl wrote.

Sohn is the second minister to come under fire as a security risk this year after Henrik Sass-Larsen, a leading member of Socialdemokraterne, was dropped from consideration for a cabinet seat after revelations he had been involved with a leading member of the Bandidos biker gang.

But while former head of the domestic security agency PET, Jørgen Bonnichsen, acknowledged to Jyllands-Posten that Sohn is in theory a greater security threat than Sass-Larsen, neither are much cause for concern.

“PET is an extraordinarily good intelligence agency that had a good handle on Russian spying in Denmark. So I’m completely sure that there’s no risk to Ole Sohn.”

In fact, the 70 million kroner PET-Kommission, which compiled a comprehensive report into the historical activities of PET, did not publish any evidence that Sohn ever accepted money from the Soviet Union. A fact Sohn has repeatedly drawn attention to.

“My past has been examined by [the Danish Institute for International Studies] and the PET-Kommission and I have been security cleared as a minister,” Sohn told Jyllands-Posten. “I have nothing to hide.”

Sohn claims he had no insight into the DKPÂ’s finances until 1990 after he won full power of the organisation. After wrestling control, he closed their printing press and paper and established Enhedslisten, an alliance of left-wing parties that includes the DKP.

Whether thatÂ’s the whole story remains unknown. But if there are any answers to be found they probably remain hidden behind the locked doors of the DKPÂ’s archives, with the only set of keys held safely in Thorning-SchmidtÂ’s hand.

Join the debate – join us on Twitter or Facebook, or leave a comment below.

SEE RELATED STORIES

Taken down by a text message

Communist past haunts prominent opposition MP

Note to readers: The Copenhagen Post will now refer to national political parties by their Danish names and abbreviations. DOWNLOAD The Copenhagen Post’s overview of Danish political parties.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”