160

General

No military commitment following Obama meeting

admin
September 5th, 2013


This article is more than 11 years old.

Following Helle Thorning-Schmidt’s meeting with the American president in Stockholm, Nordic leaders call for “strong international action” in Syria

Following her dinner with American president Barack Obama and Nordic leaders, PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt (Socialdemokraterne) stressed that Denmark's participation in a military action in Syria remains "hypothetical".

 

"We support it politically, morally and diplomatically," Thorning-Schmidt told the Danish press corps in regard to a possible action in Syria. "There is nobody who has requested that we participate militarily, so therefore I'm not going to take a position on a hypothetical question."

 

Saying that "the Americans need their closet allies", the PM reported that she let President Obama know where Denmark stood in relation to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the regime of Bashar al-Assad. 

 

READ MORE: Syria and Snowden on the Stockholm agenda

 

Joint statement strongly condemns chemical weapon use
Thorning-Schmidt and Obama joined with the heads of state of Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Finland to release a joint statement following their meeting last night. 

 

"With regard to the situation in Syria, we strongly condemn any and all use of chemical weapons, and we are convinced a strong international reaction is required," the statement read. "Those responsible for the use of chemical weapons must be held accountable."

 

The joint statement, which can be read here, also included commitments on climate change, global development and human rights. But those issues were clearly overshadowed as Obama visited Sweden on the first ever bilateral meeting in that country with a sitting US president. 

 

READ MORE: Denmark sending 100 million kroner in aid to Syria

 

Obama: Not my red line
Instead, Syria dominated much of Obama's press conference with Sweden's prime minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt. There, Obama made the case that the much-discussed 'red line' that appears to have been crossed by the Assad regime's use of chemical weapons was not a parameter that the American president had made himself. 

 

"I didn't set a red line, the world set a red line," Obama said at the press conference. "My credibility's not on the line. The international community's credibility is on the line."

 

Following the day's events in Stockholm, Thorning-Schmidt acknowledged that she stood alone among Nordic leaders in not ruling out a military action. 

 

"It is well known that there are different opinions and conclusions on that question amongst the Nordic lands," she said according to Ritzau. "All six countries [represented at last night's meeting] believe that the UN Security Council should react in this situation. That would clearly be the best if it were possible."

 

READ MORE: Danish Syrians say Assad not behind chemical attack

 

Thorning-Schmidt: Differences amongst the Nordics
The Security Council is unlikely to approve military action given Russia's veto power and long-standing support of the Assad regime. Yesterday however, Russian president Vladimir Putin told the AP that Russia "doesn't exclude" supporting UN approval of a military strike if it can be definitively proven that the Syrian government used chemical weapons. But even without a clear UN mandate, Thorning-Schmidt said that other options must be on the table.

 

"The Americans have said it very clearly," she said. "That if the UN process comes up short, they will consider a targeted military action to tell Assad that we are vehemently opposed to the use of chemical weapons, and to keep it from happening again. And we have backed up an action that goes around the UN, but not all the Nordic lands support it."

 

Obama and Putin will meet later today at the G20 Summit in St Petersburg.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”