356

News

Church, vocal minority and academics against plans to abolish public holiday, but businesses mostly in favour

Ben Hamilton
December 15th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Some are questioning the choice of holiday to scrap, others question the fairness of making people work a day extra for the same pay, while Nye Borgerlige wants a referendum!

The new government has decided to cut one of the three public holidays enjoyed by Danes every spring – the timing of all three always depends on how early or late Easter might be.

READ MORE: Big changes afoot: New government unveils startling platform

From 2024, Denmark can expect to say goodbye to Store Bededag – the Great Prayer Day, which since 1686 has represented a number of different holidays, which were then scooped up into one day: the fourth Friday after Easter.

From a religious perspective, it makes sense. The other two public holidays, which follow in the ensuing month, celebrate singular Christian holy days: Ascension and Pentecost.

Skewed logic?
However, the government did not cite religious reasons for its decision. Instead, it claimed the cut would improve Danish productivity at a time when it needs to find extra revenue to finance defence spending.

“We are asking the Danes to work one more day so that we can more quickly meet our international defence and security policy obligations,” explained PM Mette Frederiksen yesterday.

And this justification has been met by disbelief by many. After all, Ascension traditionally falls on a Thursday, and a great many companies remain closed until the following Monday even though Friday is not a public holiday.

If the government had cut Ascension, it would have gained two working days – which in turn would have made a more tangible contribution to productivity.

Nye Borgerlige wants referendum
Certainly, Nye Borgerlige is opposed to the plans: quite simply, it does not want Store Bededag to be abolished.

Its leader, Pernille Vermund, wants the matter decided by a public referendum.

She cites a 1953 law that permits sizeable minorities, when they are fiercely opposed to a bill, to request a referendum. Nearly 70 years ago, the minority was made up of 60 of Parliament’s 179 members. 

And they’re likely to have support on the left. The last time the suggestion to scrap a public holiday arose, in 2012, it was Radikale who argued strongly against it.

Church worried about losing favourite day for confirmations
The church, too, doesn’t like the proposal, arguing that  Store Bededag is traditionally a popular day for confirmations.

Kjeld Holm, a former bishop, warned DR of “strong public significance”, arguing that Pentecost would be a much better choice.

Hans Raun Iversen, a theology researcher at the University of Copenhagen, concurs that the abolition is a bad idea.

“The day off is needed. There must be room to be able to stop, take a breath and pray if you need it,” he told DR.

Backed by business
However, the business world approves of the plans. Dansk Industri deputy head Steen Nielsen claims it will significantly boost productivity – the equivalent of an extra 8,000 people working – and take the pressure off companies to fulfil their workloads at what can be a very busy time.

“It’s a helping hand to the companies that have difficulty getting the employees they need,” he said. “Getting an extra working day will mean that it will be easier to produce what is needed.”.

But Professor Henning Jørgensen, a labour market expert at Aalborg University, doesn’t think the average person on the street will enjoy working an extra day for no extra pay.

“You ask people to work more. They don’t get extra pay. I think the wage earner will react,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”