601

News

From third-in-line to minor royal: Nikolai and his siblings don’t count for much anymore

Ben Hamilton
September 29th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

All four of Prince Joachim’s children have lost their HRH titles in major shake-up ordered by the Queen

Nikolai (left) at his grandfather’s funeral (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

When Prince Nikolai, the eldest son of Prince Joachim, was born in August 1999, it was big news in Denmark. After all, he was third in line to the throne — in tennis terms, he was Andy Roddick.

Today the public struggle to remember his name. Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray (Christian, Isabella, Josefine and Vincent) have relegated him to number six in the rankings.

And now his relegation is complete, as he and his three siblings have lost their HRH status and will no longer be princes and princesses.

The dreams of a grand slam are up in the smoke emanating from their pragmatic grandmother’s 20 a day habit.

READ ALSO: More double-Danish and Dutch pastries as the BBC hails the cougar queen of Holland

No longer count for much
Royal experts contend that Queen Margrethe is seeking to consolidate the Royal Family ahead of public criticism of there being too many princes and princesses.

The decision means that Nikolai, his brother Felix, and his half-siblings Henrik and Athena will in the future be counts and countesses and addressed with the title ‘your excellence’. Prior to the change, all four had been addressed as ‘your highness’ from birth.

However, it is not a financial decision. The children of Joachim were never destined for the civil list — the select number of royals who receive ‘apanage’ from the public purse. Of the queen’s eight grandchildren, only Prince Christian is on the list.

Mother is shocked
Prince Joachim’s first wife, Countess Alexandra, the mother of Nikolai and Felix, is said to be shocked by the decision. Joachim, their father, was apparently informed of the decision in May.

Hellevon Wildenrath Løvgreen, a spokesperson for the countess, told DR that the children and Alexandra are “incredibly upset and shocked” as the decision has come “like lightning from a clear sky”.

“It is the children’s identity, and you as parents are influenced by it,” she continued. “They have taken their titles incredibly seriously and responsibly. They were both as princes and princesses, so it makes them feel vulnerable that it is taken away from them.”

Royal expert Jakob Steen Olsen is surprised the Countess Alexandra has authorised the criticism.

“It is unusual,” he told Berlingske. “In royal circles, key decisions made by Queen Margrethe are not normally discussed.”

Royal expert offers a theory, but can’t explain everything
However, Olsen does sympathise, reasoning that the young royals do not cost the Danish tax payer anything.

A Royal Family press release refers to other royal houses setting a precedent, but Olsen cannot think who it is referring to. For example, the case of Prince Harry’s children not being HRHs in the UK is not comparable.

He concludes that it is all about consolidation: “It is the queen’s attempt to trim the tree so that it continues to grow. You clean up a bit. You deal with future criticism ahead of time: for example, if the Danes were to suddenly think there were far too many going around calling themselves princes and princesses.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”