338

News

Emission omission: Transportation minister in hot water 

Christian Wenande
February 2nd, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Several parties up in arms after it emerged that Benny Engelbrecht withheld key climate figures as part of massive infrastructure plan

When the government unveiled its immense 160 billion kroner ‘Denmark Forward’ infrastructure proposal last April, it suggested the plan was CO2 neutral. 

But recently Ingeniøren newspaper published a series of articles sowing doubt about that statement.

And to boot, back when the proposal was revealed, Engelbrecht informed Parliament that figures for CO2 emissions regarding the plan didn’t exist. 

Except they did, and Engelbrecht has been accused of deliberately keeping them from the other parties.

“This is quite serious. They had the figures we specifically requested to see, but we were told that the numbers are part of the usual projection that the Energy Agency [Energistyrelsen] produces for the entire country every year,” Henning Hyllested, the spokesperson on transport issues for Enhedslisten party, told DR Nyheder.

READ ALSO: Copenhagen feels left out of huge infrastructure plans

Unacceptable explanation 
Engelbrecht, meanwhile, said that the decision not to release the figures was because they were not precise enough and therefore could not be used. 

But Hyllested doesn’t buy that explanation, arguing that it is normal for the parties to receive figures from the government that are “subject to uncertainty”.

“We think they wanted to present the deal as green – the climate crisis is underway and we all want to be seen as green – but they’ve known that there are huge CO2 emissions relating to laying these new roads,” said Hyllested.

The parties will meet a number of times this week to ascertain why they haven’t received the CO2 emission figures. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”