310

News

Reptilicus is back! Only this time it’s an endangered newt holding up a property developer

Ben Hamilton
January 22nd, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Vejlands Kvarter residential area in Amager Fælled could be delayed by another year due to concerns

Never mind Repticilus, this little bugger looks like it might develop into Alien (photo: Pixabay)

In the 1961 Danish film ‘Reptilicus’, the country’s answer to Godzilla ravaged Copenhagen on the silver screen.

Now, 60 years later, a relative of the reptilian beast is causing havoc in the capital’s biggest nature area, Amager Fælled, where it is threatening to derail the multi-million Vejlands Kvarter residential housing project, reports Politiken.

Revealing emails
The newspaper has had access to emails shared by the project developer By & Havn and the main investor Pension Danmark, and it would appear that the controversial plans, which involve building 2,000 homes, are likely to be postponed because the great crested newt, an endangered species, is a resident in the area.

The great crested newt (in Danish: stor vandsalamander, although it is not particularly big) population uses several water-holes located in the proximity of the site, which are considered vital to its breeding and future survival on the island.

Likely to be postponed
As things stand, the project is due to start in May, but now it looks likely that it will be postponed until 2022. An internal email sent by a By & Havn project manager last April conceded: “I think we should expect to receive a complaint, no matter what we choose [to do about the newts].”

Options include taking action in the area to ensure the newts aren’t harmed, or moving them somewhere else. What is clear from further emails is that the process of deciding what to do could drag on for months – most likely into next year.

Complaint likely
Danmarks Naturfredningsforening, the Danish society for nature conservation, has already noted that the plans to protect the newt aren’t good enough, and that it might feel compelled to bring the case up with the Environment and Food Complaints Board.

That could signal a significant delay to a project that has already seen off human protests. But for now, it looks like the developers might have met their match in the form of a tiny reptile the size of a child’s little finger.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”