161

News

Danish intensive care mortality rate for coronavirus lower than average

Ben Hamilton
September 21st, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

“You could say that if you get seriously ill with coronavirus, then Denmark is a good place to be,” claims Rigshospitalet doctor

Empty beds not necessarily a bad sign (photo: Churehill)

Just over a third of all coronavirus patients admitted to intensive care during the first wave of the pandemic in the spring ended up dying, according to a new study involving experts from Rigshospitalet. 

Or, if you like, nearly two-thirds survived, but it’s Monday morning, so let’s go with the former.

Well below average
Normally, the mortality rate for somebody admitted to intensive care is 35-50 percent.

And only 37 percent of the 323 patients admitted between early March and May 29 to the nation’s 29 intensive care wards died – well below the one in two ratio seen in the likes of the UK, Italy and the US.

“In relation to how severe a disease coronavirus is, we actually think that 37 percent is a relatively low mortality rate,” study co-author Nicolai Haase, an intensive care doctor at Rigshospitalet, told DR.

“It is difficult to compare countries, but you could say that if you get seriously ill with coronavirus, then Denmark is a good place to be.”

Elderly, overweight, male
The average victim was elderly, overweight and male. However, fewer had chronic diseases than you might expect: just over 70 percent. 

The average age of the admitted patients was 68, and their average BMI was 27 – two points above the cut-off for what is considered overweight. 

Some 42 percent of all male patients died, and just 29 percent of female ones.

The mortality rate among young patients was low. Among the over-50s it was just 5 percent, compared to 64 percent among the over-80s.

Important study
“It was important for us to create some concrete knowledge about this disease so that we as doctors can relate to it,” concluded Haase. 

“And also to give politicians and citizens something to make their decisions based on,” concluded Haase. 

 

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”