1036

News

Danish foreign minister apologises for sleeping with 15-year-old girl in 2008

Ben Hamilton
September 18th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

While there was nothing illegal about the encounter, Jeppe Kofod was 34 at the time and in a position of authority at the party of which the girl was a youth member

For many internationals living in Denmark, the news that the foreign minister, Jeppe Kofod, slept with a 15-year-old girl in 2008 when he was 34 will initially be shocking. 

After all, the age-of-consent might be 15 in Denmark, but it is 16 in many countries. The age difference is also generally frowned upon. At the age of 34, popular wisdom suggests Kofod should have divided his age by two and added seven, and realised that 15 is a long way short of 24. 

And given his position of authority at the time as the Socialdemokratiet spokesperson for foreign affairs, there are strong grounds to claim this was a case of #MeToo – particularly as Denmark would appear to be having its moment almost three years after the Harvey Weinstein revelations exploded in October 2017.

You do realise we’ve seen ‘Borgen’!
But after digesting the facts, many internationals will start to realise the whole affair is beginning to look like an episode of ‘Borgen’. 

Birgitte Nyborg has nodded her head and Kasper Juul has had a word with his cronies in the media. An old story is revamped and pressure is mounting on a politician to resign – with Radikale and Alternativet both calling the PM’s decision to appoint him as foreign minister an “error of judgment”. 

It’s the same media that for three years have been downplaying #MeToo with the admonishment that ‘we don’t go into these kinds of things in Denmark’, in between non-condemnatory reports of Jørgen Leth sleeping with his Haitian housekeeper’s teenage daughter. He is after all a national treasure.

Apologising again
Kofod yesterday apologised again for his error of judgment in 2008, which took place after his participation as a lecturer at an event organised by DSU, the Socialdemokratiet youth association of which the 15-year-old was a member.

“I can also only repeat what I said in 2008: an unreserved apology for what happened. I wish I could change what happened. I cannot, but I can learn from it. And I have learned from it,” he said.

The difference, of course, is that Kofod resigned from his post in 2008.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”