627

News

Danish passport fifth most powerful in the world

Ayee Macaraig
July 7th, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

The coronavirus has changed the rules of who gets to travel where and even Americans do not have as much mobility as before

Photo: Christian Wenande

The Danish passport remains among the world’s highest ranked but the coronavirus pandemic has redefined international travel even for holders of premium passports.

Denmark placed fifth in the 2020 Henley Passport Index, a ranking of the world’s passports based on the number of destinations their holders can access without a prior visa. Danes can travel to 187 destinations with visa-free access.

This year’s ranking is slightly lower than the 2018 standing where Denmark placed third. The list was published on Tuesday.

‘Extraordinary shift’
Henley & Partners, a London-based global citizenship and residency advisory firm, produces the rankings based on data from the International Air Transport Association. The association maintains a global database of travel information.

In first place this year was Japan, followed by Singapore. South Korea and Germany ranked third while Italy, Finland, Spain, and Luxembourg placed fourth. Austria tied with Denmark in fifth place.

Yet 2020 is an extraordinary year for international travellers with the coronavirus shifting the rules of who can travel where.

For instance, while the US passport is the world’s seventh most powerful, Americans cannot travel to Europe as their country was excluded from the EU list due to the high number of cases there. Henley & Partners said that Americans now have roughly the same level of travel freedom as Uruguay citizens due to the EU ban.

“This is one of many extraordinary shifts in passport power caused by the temporary pandemic-related bans,” Henley & Partners said.

Demand for dual citizenship
The firm said that the Coronavirus Crisis increases the demand for dual citizenship and investor visas.

“For investors and their families, having a second citizenship or an alternative residence is an even more precious asset than ever before, as concerns over access to first-rate healthcare, global mobility, and quality of life take on a new urgency,” said Juerg Steffen, CEO of Henley & Partners.

The firm added that places that are well governed and better equipped to deal with the pandemic will become target destinations for relocation.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”