133

News

Danish companies silent on Facebook ad boycott

Ayee Macaraig
July 1st, 2020


This article is more than 4 years old.

Marketing experts say Danish companies are not visible in the debate about Facebook and its role in the spread of hate speech

About 240 international brands are pulling advertising from Facebook as part of a campaign against hate speech, but Danish companies are so far silent on the issue.

Multinationals such as Starbucks, Coca-Cola and Unilever are supporting the ‘StopHateforProfit’ campaign, which aims to pressure Facebook into preventing the spread of hate speech and misinformation by pulling ad revenue from the platform in July.

Yet unlike the US and other global firms, Danish companies do not appear to be joining the boycott, according to advertising agency executives.

“I am aware of the debate but not one of our customers has been aware of it,” Mikael Jørgensen, the CEO of the advertising agency &CO., told DR.

Not visible
US civil rights groups launched the ‘StopHateforProfit’ campaign following the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man killed by Minneapolis police last month. The campaign aims to hold Facebook accountable for its lack of action on misinformation and hate speech.

Marketing experts, however, said that Danish companies are unlikely to demand action from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

“We are not used to companies taking that type of responsibility,” Gry Høngsmark Knudsen, an associate professor of marketing at the University of Southern Denmark, told DR.

“Danish companies have not been a particularly visible part of the public debate. So going out and putting pressure on Facebook would be very new to them,” she added.

Can’t hide behind platform
Facebook has said that it will team up with civil rights groups to develop more tools to fight hate speech, including measures to ban ads and label hate speech from politicians. Activists though want more action, urging Europe to introduce stronger regulations for tech companies.

While Danish companies have not stopped advertising on Facebook, Jørgensen said that he personally backed the campaign.

“I think it’s great that companies do it. You can’t just hide behind a platform and say you just use it,” he said.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”