171

News

Tax authority gunning for British connection in fraud case

Christian Wenande
August 21st, 2018


This article is more than 6 years old.

Over 70 firms and individuals stand accused of taking part in massive swindle

The chase is on in earnest now (photo: Pixabay)

Close to three years after it emerged that the Danish state had been defrauded to the tune of 12 billion kroner in reimbursed taxes, the SKAT tax authority looks to be making its first big move in the case.

According to the judicial news site Law 360, 71 individuals and companies from the UK are being sued for taking part in the huge swindle. SKAT reportedly filed 71 lawsuits at the High Court in London in late July.

The suits reveal that SKAT is also turning to legal proceedings in a bid to force two banks, Barclays and NatWest, to reveal information regarding customers who are believed to be involved in the case.

“These suits underline that this alleged swindle has been mostly organised by operators using London as their base,” Thomas Svaneborg, a DR business journalist, told DR Nyheder.

“There are some very big, well known players in the middle of this case.

READ MORE: US pension funds involved in billion kroner SKAT fraud

Swindler Shah
“It’s from London that the British businessman Sanjay Shah has operated his company Solo Capital,” continued Svaneborg.

Shah is believed to be the man behind the fraud and today he reportedly lives a life of luxury in Dubai. Shah’s now-closed Solo Capital offered small US pension firms aggressive financial products that speculated on the Danish state coffers.

When a Danish company pays dividends to its shareholders, SKAT keeps 27 percent, but if the shares are owned by foreign shareholders, the 27 percent can be refunded.

But SKAT’s control of the refunding system was virtually non-existent and Solo Capital sent in false dividends reimbursement papers and ended up defrauding the Danish state out of almost 13 billion kroner before the swindle was discovered in the summer of 2015.

Aside from the UK, SKAT has also filed suits against people and companies in the US, Canada, Luxembourg and Malaysia. About 2.7 billion kroner has already been seized from accounts abroad, including in Germany.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”