3864

News

Mette bets a bottle of wine against becoming next NATO head, even though she’s odds-on with the bookies

Ben Hamilton
June 15th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Danish PM this morning staked a good French red she’d be premier at the end of the summer, but punters are confident she’ll land the top job and succeed Jens Stoltenberg

Beginning to look like it’s what Lars Løkke’s been fearing all along (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

What a difference a week makes! On June 7, the bookmaker Bet 25 started betting on who will become the next head of NATO. At that point, Mette Frederiksen was listed at 5/1 – the joint second favourite behind the British defence minister, Ben Wallace.

Today, the Danish PM is odds-on to become the next general-secretary of NATO: a clear 1/2 favourite (1.5 in digital terms). Wallace, meanwhile, has been pushed out to 17/4 (5.25).

At the time of writing, CPH POST could not find any other bookmakers offering a market, but the swing certainly suggests that either Bet 25 has been hit by multiple bets on Frederiksen, or it was advised to rethink its outlook.

Certainly, Bet 25 has not been put off by a recent report in the Wall Street Journal that Poland will oppose Frederiksen’s selection and instead favour Estonian PM Kaja Kallas.

Poland’s ambassador to Denmark, Antoni Falkowski, was quick to take to Twitter yesterday evening to refute the report.  “Poland is not against any potential candidates,” he wrote.

Stoltenberg reiterates intention to not seek extension
To accede to the position that Frederiksen continues to deny any interest in, there must be a vacancy to fill, and the incumbent Jens Stoltenberg was yesterday pressed by TV2 to confirm whether there’s any chance he will continue once his term expires on September 30. 

Initially, he appeared to offer a carrot to the eager rabbit with the admission his future lies in the hands of the 31 NATO countries, who will at their summit from July 10-11 in Lithuania elect a general-secretary. 

According to the Financial Times, several countries have said they would like to see Stoltenberg continue.

But Stoltenberg yesterday clarified: “I have no intention of seeking an extension.”

Bookmakers should accordingly classify him as a non-runner, but if there is a chink of light, it’s that Bet 25 is specifically betting on who will succeed Stoltenberg.

Mette Bets: Frederiksen opening her own bookmaker chain
TV2 correspondent Lotte Mejlhede, who pressed Stoltenberg for the comments at a press conference in Brussels yesterday, was not convinced by Stoltenberg’s protestation that he has no influence on his own future.

“Of course he has. If he doesn’t want an extension, he can just say straight: I don’t want that under any circumstances,” she said.

One of the 31 NATO countries has already said it would support an extension to his contract: Denmark!

Frederiksen today welcomed the possibility as a “good solution” when she was asked at the ongoing Folkemødet politics festival on Bornholm.

“Stoltenberg has been excellent at the head of NATIO for many years, and also during a very dramatic time. And I think that is largely Stoltenberg’s merit, so if we can get him to continue, I think it is a really, really good solution,” she said.

“No, I’m not on my way to NATO,” she reiterated and, staying with the betting theme, bet her interviewer, Stéphanie Surrugue, a bottle of good French red wine that she would still be Danish PM at the end of the  summer.

If not Frederiksen or Stoltenberg …
But who will become NATO head if not Frederiksen or Stoltenberg? 

According to Bet 25, after Wallace, the aforementioned Estonian PM Kaja Kallas is 23/2 alongside Dutch PM Mark Rutte.

Lithuanian PM Ingrida Šimonytė is 14/1, EU Commission head Ursula von der Leyen and Slovakian President Zuzana Čaputová both 19/1, and Chrystia Freeland, the Canadian finance minister, 49/1. 

The Financial Times identifies the most favoured candidate as being female and from eastern Europe. Certainly, the last two general-secretaries have all been Scandinavian, so Frederiksen would make it three in a row.

But nevertheless, her chances of becoming NATO general-secretary are as probable as Manchester City winning a trophy next season.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”