1803

News

Supreme Court finds in favour of newspaper in Little Mermaid copyright case

Ben Hamilton
May 24th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Following defeats in lower courts in 2020 and 2022, Berlingske newspaper celebrated victory today after it was acknowledged it hadn’t violated the Danish Copyright Act

Court ruled in newspaper’s favour (photo: Pixabay)

For once, a court has ruled against the heirs of the sculptor who created The Little Mermaid, denying them yet another payday.

Use of the statue’s likeness is strictly prohibited in the media, unless it is a story directly concerning the statue created by Edvard Eriksen in 1913. Many have made the mistake of including it in material promoting Copenhagen – to their cost.

A copyright, which expires in 2029 some 70 years after Eriksen’s death, is fiercely protected by Eriksen’s heirs, some 110 years after its creation – earning  them untold amounts in royalties.

And it looked like Berlingske newspaper was the latest to have to pay out – after the city and high courts found in the heirs’ favour.

A victory for satire
But the Supreme Court has today found in favour of the newspaper, ruling it was within its right to use the statue’s likeness on two occasions.

In 2019, it depicted the statue as a zombie in a cartoon, and then in 2020, it displayed a photo of the statue wearing a facemask to illustrate a corona scepticism story. 

Previously, Berlingske had been found in violation of the Danish Copyright Act in 2020 and 2022, but today was a time for celebration.

Editor Tom Jensen called it “a very happy day – not just for us, but for all media in Denmark”, adding that the judgment had lifted a shadow off the future of satirical cartoons in particular.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”