2192

Things to do

Performance Review: The curious straits of Benjamin Britten

Ben Hamilton
May 22nd, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

★★★★☆☆

When they’re mobbed up, it’s quite the show (photo: Camilla Winther)

Everything about this production of Benjamin Britten’s opera Peter Grimes is very Turneresque – if that’s a legitimate art term.

A clever little screen pulled down at the front of the stage renders cinematic maritime vistas that linger long in the memory.

Credit must go to Tazeena Firth (set) and Kimmo Ruskela (lighting) for evoking the 1820s vibes of an eastern coast fishing village, the setting of this curious little opera.

Thankful for the Danish translation
Curious, not in a paltry way as this is more or less Britain’s most revered opera, but simply because it is British – a language better suited to anarcho-punk than arias, let’s face it.

And that might be the rub: for all the insistence that opera transcends language, it’s a different matter when it’s your own, and the Anglophiles among our readers will surely want to be able to follow the action without depending on the Danish supertitles!

Very few of the performers can be understood. Morten Staugaard as Swallow and Hannah Fischer as Auntie are notable exceptions, but maybe this critique is misplaced, as whispered undertones are so much easier to understand than the shrill sopranos. 

Thrilling mob-rule moments
Hard to know how many end up screaming the accusatory chorus of “Peter Grimes” at the end of the third and final act, but suffice it to say, there’s enough to re-enact the Charge of the Light Brigade.

For the audience, it’s thrilling to see so many performers on stage together – and particularly when they’re a mob this angry.

So while I won’t be rushing out to buy tickets to see another English-language opera, this comes recommended for its curiosities.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”