3421

News

Campaign to publicise phone siren test an 8.7 million kroner failure, conclude experts

Ben Hamilton
May 16th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Despite a more than generous budget, the public were not sufficiently informed they needed an updated device to receive the alert

Most phones needed to be fully updated to receive the siren (photo: pexels)

The campaign to publicise the new addition to the early May testing of the country’s emergency sirens – a cacophony of noise emitted by all Danish mobile phones – cost the Ministry of Defence 8.7 million kroner to orchestrate, according to official documents accessed by DR.

And it was not money well spent, contends experts, as the campaign to inform the public about S!RENEN failed to make it clear it would not be audible if most phone users did not have a fully updated operating system.

This explains why only 64 percent of the country’s mobile phone owners can confirm they got the alert siren via their devices, according to figures from DEMA, the emergency management agency responsible for informing the public.

Key piece of information was missing
Professor Jakob Stoustrup, an electronic systems expert at Aalborg University, cannot believe the failings of DEMA’s campaign given that 8.7 million kroner was spent on publicising S!RENEN.

“I have nothing nice to say about the fact that you should have a fully updated phone. It was a key piece of information that was missing from the communication,” he told DR.

But while it was made clear via sirenen.dk that “your Apple phone can safely receive alerts via S!RENEN, if it’s an iPhone 8 or later that’s updated to iOS 16.4 or later”, along with provisions for android phones, the information was not effectively conveyed in the media.

Absolute majority knew about the extra siren
Ahead of the test, most media outlets were more interested in the potentially harmful effect of the siren on vulnerable groups, such as former veterans. Many feared the siren could be triggering.

It was widely reported there was only one way the public could silence their phones: by switching them off. 

And it was certainly well publicised, as 98 percent of the public knew what was coming, according to a Megafon study.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”