506

News

Volatile cocktail: Latest Danish terror threat assessment identifies new kind of person of interest to the authorities

Ben Hamilton
March 28th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Likely perpetrators of terrorism are increasingly being driven by multiple narratives, rather than just one ideology. But the threat of militant Islamists remains the largest one facing the country

The profile of the typical terror perpetrator is getting increasingly complicated (photo: Riemann)

The latest terror threat assessment carried out by Center for Terroranalyse (CAT) for the PET intelligence agency again identifies militant Islamists as the most likely perpetrators of terrorism within Denmark’s borders.

While the leadership of large organisations such as Islamic State and Al Qaeda has been weakened of late, their influence remains strong – in June, two IS sympathisers were each sentenced to 12.5 years in prison for intent to make bombs for an attack.

Furthermore, a 35-year-old man was also given a lengthy sentence after being convicted of planning and financing terrorism in December – the kind of perpetrator who PET claims is fuelled by a “cocktail of hate”.

Overall, the threat level remains ‘serious’, so on a scale of one to five, a four, which is unchanged from last year, or indeed 2010. The report has been in existence since 2007. 

Hybridisation can involve multiple triggers
In its latest report, CTA identifies a new kind of terrorism that is growing: hybridisation.

Perpetrators are no longer fuelled by one ideology, but rather many narratives. This could be a preoccupation with conspiracy theories, disinformation on social media, digitalisation, the climate crisis, the pandemic or triggering events such as the attack on Capitol Hill, the culling of the mink, or the War in Ukraine. They may have a fascination with violence or a mental disorder.

“We can see that it is a growing trend in the West and in Denmark that individuals increasingly put together a cocktail of their own world and enemy images, which are characterised by ideological and religious ideas,” explained CTA head Michael Hamann.

PET warns that the new kind of terrorism can end up involving perpetrators who have not been extreme before – and that their target is often the authorities, such as “elected officials or certain professionals”. PET is accordingly monitoring “the derivative effects of heightened rhetoric that may have an impact on the threat picture”.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”