672

News

Insurance company reconsiders BMI stance in light of criticism

Ben Hamilton
March 27th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

PFA Pension will no longer turn down interest from potential customers solely based on their ‘severely obese’ classification

BMI of over 35 marked in dark orange (image: Laurens van Lieshout)

A DR story about a woman with a BMI of over 35 – who vowed to take legal action when she was turned down for both life and loss of working ability insurance – has clearly had a major effect, as the insurer PFA Pension has promised it will no longer base decisions on the score of a BMI alone

“The debate has made an impression on us, and therefore we have sat down and reconsidered whether this was the right practice,” confirmed Ole Krogh Petersen, the CEO of  PFA Pension.

“We will look individually at the customer’s overall health conditions, so that it is not just the BMI that will be decisive. If you are otherwise perfectly healthy, and the only thing you have is an elevated BMI, then we think it is fair enough that you can also take out insurance.”

However, Petersen cautions that “very, very few” people with a BMI of over 35 won’t have extenuating health circumstances.

Three companies singled out
A Body Mass Index of over 35 places somebody in the severely obese category, but critics of the index claim it does not properly take into account different body shapes and densities: for example a bodybuilder.

Among those to criticise the insurance companies’ policy, which experts have confirmed is legal, are doctors, politicians, the Forbrugerrådet Tænk think-tank, and human rights institute Institut for Menneskerettigheder.

According to their so-called ‘freedom of agreement’, the companies are not obliged to offer all potential customers insurance and are free to make their own assessment of a citizen’s health and risk.

AP Pension and Danica Pension have also been singled out for criticism. AP Pension has informed DR that it might change the way it operates, but Danica Pension declined to comment.

Other factors will be considered
PFA Pension previously informed Mona Ebdrup, a 32-year-old mother who “cycles every day, practises yoga, eats healthily and has virtually no sick days”, that she was “severely overweight, so cannot be allowed to take out life insurance with us”, in light of her BMI of 37.5.

PFA Pension reasons that it will still consider the index, but also other factors in the future.

“BMI and severe overweight are still a very big risk factor, so of course BMI will still be a factor – it’s just not the only thing we will look at,” concluded Petersen. 

Around 4 percent of adult Danes have a BMI of over 35, according to Nationalt Center for Overvægt.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”