463

News

Justice minister takes first step towards criminalising ‘stealthing’

Loïc Padovani
January 31st, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Stealthing is when somebody secretly removes their condom without telling the other (photo: Flickr/Tina Franklin)

Anyone who’s seen the acclaimed HBO series ‘I May Destroy You’ knows what stealthing is. It’s when somebody, normally a man, removes a condom during intercourse without informing their sexual partner.

Widely considered to be a form of sexual assault, there’s no legislation prohibiting the practice in Denmark – to widespread dismay from the likes of Sex og Samfund and Everyday Sexism Project Denmark, who have been steadily campaigning for its criminalisation.

But finally, it looks like the hard work is paying off, as the justice minister, Peter Hummelgaard, has said he intends to tale action.

Already illegal in many countries
A recent report issued by Columbia University concludes that victims of stealthing suffer the same kind of psychological harm as people exposed to other forms of sexual assault, such as rape.

It is good news for victims like 28-year-old Stephanie Sørensen, who was brave enough to share her experience with TV2.

“I hadn’t even considered that he could do it. It’s so uncomfortable and obnoxious that someone is willing to overstep these boundaries and show so little respect. Especially when you’re doing something so intimate,” she recalled.

The UK, Australia and New Zealand all have laws protecting people from stealthing, but nothing exists in Denmark. So when victims report the act to the police, they are surprised to learn there is nothing they can do.

Could be a lengthy process to introduce law
Hummelgaard has confirmed it will now be investigated: the problem itself and how severely perpetrators should be punished.

“Now we, here at the ministry, will try to get an overview of the problem, gather the necessary experience and then convene a meeting of the parties in Parliament about it in the foreseeable future,” he promised.

However, a law professor warns it will be no formality.

“You have to make sure you formulate the penalty provision in such a way that it hits exactly what you want to punish, and that you also make sure you formulate it in a way that it will also be possible to prove in practice,” Professor Trine Baumbach told DR.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”