785

Opinion

Early Rejser: Starting the New Year without a bang 
Adam Reece Wells

January 28th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

Fido just ran through a fire door trying to escape this lot (photo: Pixabay)

It’s New Year’s Eve and I’m reclining by the fireside. My hand clasps a glass of cold champagne and those well-known lines of ‘Auld Lang Syne’ turn my thoughts to friends old and new. 

Or rather I dreamed of that scene as I stood in the dark bedroom, arms aching from the weight of a flailing, wailing baby, while rockets exploded outside.

I’ve always doubted the magic of NYE. I thought its only power was making you feel like a loser for not having a better time. But I doubt its magic no longer. It turned our dog – a sturdy, stoic soul who takes a toddler’s kick to the face with unflinching grace – into a trembling wreck. It turned our toddler, who had just mastered the art of sleeping like a dog, into a howling, waking nightmare. 

Need a NYE revolution
Six years ago, on my first NYE in Copenhagen, I sat alone on a Vanløse balcony watching with awe as the sky came alive. Today, burdened with dog and offspring, I have cause to look less fondly upon 12 straight hours of deafening explosions. 

I’m not such a scrooge I would deny others an experience I once enjoyed because my circumstances changed. But the downsides to the experience aren’t limited to my circumstances, and those who share my newfound resentment for the event outnumber those who enjoy it. 

Pet owners have long been maddened by NYE. The phrase ‘barking mad’ was coined in 1809 when a fireworks display at Frogmore, held to celebrate the golden jubilee of George III, drove the royal dogs into a frenzy that didn’t abate for days. Pets aside, everyone should be maddened, not because I fabricated that anecdote, but because the planet’s supposed green capital marks the new year by polluting it. 

No smoke without fireworks 
There’s the litter: the boxes and shells strewn all over our parks and roads. And there’s the environmental damage, which no army of street sweepers can clean up. I could have looked up fancy stats about greenhouse gases, but I think common sense should suffice here: fireworks are made of plastic, metal, chemicals and fucking gunpowder, so I think we should just agree not to blow millions of them up in our lower atmosphere. 

One stat I do have is that 250 pigeons are killed every year by fireworks in Denmark.  If your first thought was “So what?”, I’d point out that pigeons are just non-white doves and you’re just a bird racist. If your first thought was “You’ve made that up too”, you’re absolutely right. The impact on birds must be severe though. Imagine what fish would think if half the city spent an evening firing explosives into the ocean. 

New acquaintance be forgot?
So, the victims of fireworks are: pets, pet owners, infants, parents, birds, street sweepers and Planet Earth, with victims also found amongst the revellers – hundreds of whom get injured every year.

I’m not the sort to call for bans, but fireworks are already banned in Denmark 99 percent of the time. Why not make it 100? This isn’t The Purge. We have no ancient, base tendency towards firework displays we must vent to prevent us craving Catherine Wheels all year round. 

Tradition and lack of political will are why the show goes on, but when the environment’s at risk, there’s no excuse for either. I suppose you could excuse the sale of eco-friendly fireworks. But frankly I don’t care how friendly they make them. They’re still going to scare the shit out of my dog.

About

Adam Reece Wells

Adam is a childcare professional, an amateur athlete and an amateurish musician. He’s unappreciated on Twitter @stringsandink


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”