415

News

King Charles ready to follow Queen Margrethe’s lead and not grant HRH status to Prince Harry’s children

Ben Hamilton
January 6th, 2023


This article is more than 1 year old.

The British media have been busy championing the Danish monarch’s trailblazing resolve in the build-up to the release of ‘Spare’, but nobody was expecting the revelations to be so explosive

Prince Harry visited Denmark in 2017 (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

You might not think there’s an obvious link between Denmark and Prince Harry’s recent explosive revelations – Netflix must be miffed he saved them all for his book – but you’d be wrong.

The British media are hailing Queen Margrethe II as a trailblazer for the way she stripped away the HRH titles of all four children of her son Prince Joachim, salaciously hoping that new monarch Charles III will more or less do the same to his own son, Prince Harry.

The US media are also drawing parallels. “Think of Joachim as Prince Harry, Prince Frederik as Prince William, and Queen Margarethe as King Charles, and everything feels like deja vu,” purred American magazine People.

Margrethe’s decision a warning, claims UK media
Margrethe’s decision is a key talking point this week in Britain. A headline in the Daily Express on Wednesday read: “Danish Queen’s title removal serves as warning for Harry amid fears over memoir.”

King Charles was reportedly waiting until after the release of Harry’s docuseries and memoir ‘Spare’ – which was due to be released on January 10, but was released in Spain under the title ‘En La Sombra’ (in the shadow) after a cock-up that nobody can explain – to make a decision on whether to grant HRH titles to Harry’s children, Archie and Lillibet.

Previously, they were not granted, as it was reasoned they were the sitting monarch’s great-grandchildren, not grandchildren.

Charles watching Danish developments “with interest”
Charlotte Griffiths, a royal expert who works for the Mail on Sunday, concurs there is “a lot riding on” Harry’s book. “Reportedly, Charles is waiting until the book comes out before he decides whether he gives Archie and Lilibet a title,” she told Palace Confidential.

A royal expert in Denmark, BT correspondent Jacob Heinel Jensen, compared the release of Harry’s book to Prince Joachim’s appearance on television shortly after his mother’s decision was confirmed. 

“When Prince Joachim went rogue on TV saying how upset he was, how his children are suffering: the parallels between him and Harry are there for all to see,” he told British newspaper The Daily Mail. “King Charles would have been watching what is happening in Denmark with great interest.”

Up to the neck in revelations
The revelations of the Netflix show ‘Harry & Meghan’ were tame compared to those in Harry’s book, which British tabloids have been frantically translating into Spanish over the last 24 hours.

Among the numerous revelations, Harry reveals that his brother Prince William physically attacked him in his own home, that William and his wife Catherine find Nazi costumes funny, that he and William pleaded with Charles not to marry Camilla, that he first tried cocaine aged 17, and that he lost his virginity to an older woman who “really liked horses” in a field near a busy pub.

Meanwhile, former British army personnel have questioned whether Harry was wise to reveal he killed 25 members of the Taliban whilst on duty in Afghanistan, as it might further jeopardise his future security.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”