1238

News

Fewer vulnerable areas in Denmark

Christian Wenande
December 1st, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Stærevej, Tingbjerg and Aldersrogade are among the Copenhagen areas no longer on vulnerable housing list

The number of neighbourhoods on the government’s annual parallel society list has once again dropped – from 20 to 17

December 1 traditionally signals the run-up to Christmas in Denmark with the beginning of the popular Christmas calendars for kids on TV.

But for the government, it’s the day when the annual parallel society list – formerly known as the stigmatising ‘Ghetto List’ – is presented to the public.

The list contains vulnerable neighbourhoods in which at least 50 percent of residents have non-western backgrounds and are either unemployed or have criminal records.

According to the list, published by the Housing Ministry, the number of vulnerable areas and parallel societies are once again both on the decline.

“As of 1 December 2022, there are 17 vulnerable housing areas compared to 20 in 2021,” the report found.

“The number of parallel societies is down to 10 from 12 last year. There are also fewer hardcore vulnerable areas [from 10 to 9], and therefore no new housing areas encompassed by development plan demands.”

READ ALSO: Forget parallel societies: Is the ghetto plan stuck in a parallel universe?

Ta-ta, Tingbjerg
The nine areas remaining on the hardcore list are:

Mjølnerparken, Copenhagen

Tåstrupgård, Høje-Taastrup

Vollsmose, Odense 

Nørager/Søstjernevej, Sønderborg 

Stengårdsvej, Esbjerg 

Sundparken, Horsens 

Skovvejen/Skovparken, Kolding 

Bispehaven, Aarhus 

Gellerupparken/Toveshøj, Aarhus

Tingbjerg/Utterslevhuse, an area that had been on the hardcore list every year bar one since 2010, is no longer on the list.

While Askerød (Greve) and Rønnebærparken/Æblehaven (Roskilde) are new to the vulnerable housing area list, Houlkærvænget (Viborg), Grønneparken (Holbæk), Stærevej, Tingbjerg and Aldersrogade (all Copenhagen) are off it.

“I’m a happy and proud mayor of Copenhagen today on behalf of residents, workers, housing organisations and politicians who have joined to take on a massive task in Tingbjerg and Aldersrogade, which are now off the vulnerable housing area list,” said Copenhagen mayor Sophie Hæstrup Andersen.

Check out the entire report here (in Danish).


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”