630

News

2022 General Election: Immigration policies were crucial in 2019, but how important are they this time around?

Robin Dickheiwer
October 27th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

The sad truth, or at least for foreigners in Denmark, is that many voters are immune to the harsh rhetoric and measures in the area

Rwanda is still getting a lot of mentions, but not as much as inflation and the energy problems (photo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Int’l Cooperation, Rwanda)

Over the last few weeks, the policies of Denmark’s political parties have been revamped to fight this year’s general election on November 1.

Heavy focus in 2019
In the build-up to the last election in 2019, Danish political parties used immigration and refugees as a politicised policy area . But now, with inflation issues, the Energy Crisis and a war on European soil, immigration and asylum policies are less politicised and the focus has been a lot smaller.

Besides, many of the parties have similar stances, with some of the left, including the government’s party, tough on immigration. 

Still of interest for expats
Nevertheless, one of the most essential things to understand for expats in Denmark is of course how future immigration policies might affect them.

Here is a small overview of what the biggest parties have planned on the immigration front.


Socialdemokratiet: true to its name or populists?
Socialdemokratiet is traditionally a left-leaning party. However, in certain policy fields, it has taken a similar stance to more extreme and populist governments. This is exemplified by its zero refugee policy (until the Russian invasion of Ukraine) and its recent Rwanda deal, a policy that wants to prevent asylum-seekers from entering the country. The idea is to ensure refugees stay closer to the area they are fleeing from. Establishing reception centres where asylum cases can be processed outside of Europe should mean that refugees who have travelled to Denmark will be transported back in the direction they came in.

Venstre: Vested interest in integrated is important
Venstre, a centre-right party, argues that immigrants need to be integrated better: that they should learn Danish and understand and respect Danish culture and traditions. They make it clear that this integration is the personal responsibility of the immigrant. Venstre wants to introduce ‘Arbejdspligt’ (work duty) for unemployed people and to include foreigners who are out of work. Taking pert in Arbejdspligt would be necessary to qualify for Kontanthjælp (cash benefits).

Konservative: Keep out social welfare-seeking foreigners
Konservative also contends that immigrants should talk Danish. It supports the Rwanda policy, wants to lower the social benefits foreigners receive, and want to introduce more requirements for those who wish to receive benefits. Ultimately it wants to make Denmark an unattractive destination for foreigners interested in claiming social benefits.

Radikale: Rwandan idea a big misstep
Radikale Venstre, a centre-left party, tends to be on the left when it comes to welfare and social issues, but on the rights regarding economic matters. Radikale forced the elections by threatening to topple the government by withdrawing its support and tabling a vote of no-confidence. The primary motivation was the Rwanda policy, which Radikale opposes strongly. Radikale also wants to improve the manner of deportations: how they are arranged and conducted.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”