248

News

Three men acquitted in Mette Frederiksen effigy burning case

Santiago Sebastián
September 15th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

The case hinged on how serious a threat the spectacle was

The effigy in question

Three men have been acquitted of all charges in relation to the burning of an effigy made up to look like PM Mette Frederiksen early last year.

All three admitted to participating in a January 2021 demonstration in central Copenhagen protesting against the government’s measures to deal with the coronavirus, but denied setting the effigy on fire.

READ MORE: MPs condemn Capitol-style “lynching” of PM’s effigy during Saturday’s anti-lockdown demonstrations

Wording of threat crucial
The men, all aged 30 with no previous criminal convictions, stood accused of threatening the prime minister by hanging up an effigy with her face on it and a sign hung around the neck saying: “Should and must be sacrificed”. It was subsequently set on fire.

Prosecutors argued that if a statement made at a demonstration is manifestly and unequivocally a threat, it is punishable.

But the defence countered that if a statement is made in an ambiguous manner, freedom of expression and assembly considerations must be taken into account in the assessment.

Possible life sentence!
The defendants initially faced charges relating to the rarely used Article 113, which deals with threatening the security of Parliament or attempting to threaten or obstruct members of Parliament from freely exercising their duty.

Had those charges resulted in a conviction, they could have faced up to 16 years’ imprisonment or, in particularly aggravating circumstances, life imprisonment.

In the end the men were charged under the somewhat softer Article 119, which deals with violence against public officials.

Prosecution sought four months
The prosecutors argued in court that the three men should be sentenced to four months of imprisonment, but all three were unanimously acquitted at Frederiksberg Court.

It is now known whether the state will appeal against the verdict.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”