577

News

There could be trouble ahead for the man destined to become Denmark’s first gay PM

Ben Hamilton
September 13th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

A series of untruths could potentially trip up Konservative leader Søren Pape Poulsen in his bid to make history

There are several ways you could headline a story about Konservative leader Søren Pape Poulsen, one of three politicians in contention to become prime minister after the next general election, right now.

“Pape is flying high” is one. Since the last election, Konservative has added 19 seats in Parliament to hold 31 mandates, just 12 fewer that government party Socialdemokratiet and 11 clear of Blue Bloc cousin Venstre.

“Pape is flying low” is another, as the second favourite to become this country’s next PM is doing his best to remain below the radar, refusing to answer questions about a series of concerns relating to his husband Josue Medina Vasquez Poulsen, a national of the Dominican Republic.

READ MORE: It’s official! Denmark could have its first gay PM!

In an age of misinformation
The public expect their politicians to tell the truth, or so we are led to believe. PM Mette Frederiksen’s popularity has plummeted of late, most likely because many Danes did not buy her explanation that she did not know her order to cull 17 million mink in late 2019 was illegal until after it was given.

But who really knows in these days of populism and social media posts that ‘the other half’ never end up seeing thanks to algorithms and general interference.

The media might as well have employed Boris Johnson and Donald Trump factcheckers in recent times, such was their tendency to fib with their every breath. But they both won elections.

And now the heir apparent to the biggest job in Danish politics has been caught out by a series of mistruths. Some are borderline mild, while others should perhaps be of serious concern to the electorate.

He’s like my nephew, capeesh?
First off, let’s look at the mild untruth: we’ve all seen ‘The Sopranos’, right, in which Tony has a nephew called Christopher. Wrong! That’s an affectionate term, as Christopher is in fact Tony’s cousin once removed.

In the same way, Josue Poulsen is not the nephew of Danilo Medina, the former president of the Dominican Republic, who stepped down in 2020, or indeed Horacio Vásquez, who last ruled in 1930.

Poulsen first made the claim that his husband was the nephew of Medina in 2014, when he was actually in power.

On September 8, he told TV2 that he should have been more precise about their relationship: “I don’t know how much they talk together, but I actually don’t think it’s the most interesting thing about me wanting to be prime minister.”

So he converted … like David Koresh?
Secondly, there is the matter of Poulsen claiming Josue Poulsen is Jewish. He made the claim in the Danish Parliament in front of prominent members of the Jewish community to underline that he is well advised regarding Jewish matters.

“It just so happens that my better half is Jewish. And has come to the synagogue from infancy with his family every Saturday,” Ekstra Bladet reported him as saying.

But then some fact-checking by the tabloid in both the Dominican Republic and Venzuela, the countries where Josue Poulsen grew up, revealed that his family were all members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, a Christian denomination they were fiercely committed to.

Initially, Pape came out fighting with a written comment: “I did not know that we had to register Jews in Denmark. You do that at Ekstra Bladet.” But since then he has remained silent.

Ministerial meetings on holiday
Finally, both Jyllands-Posten and Ekstra Bladet have revealed that Pape met senior members of the Dominican Republic administration in an ‘unofficial capacity’ in 2018 whilst he was the justice minister of Denmark.

Pape was on holiday, and concerns have been raised by Jeppe Kofod, the foreign minister, that such a meeting was deeply appropriate, as the government remains unaware of what was discussed, even though some details were reported in local Dominican media. Even more peculiarly, Danmarksdemokraterne leader Inge Støjberg, the then minister for immigration and integration, was also present.

“I find it highly problematic that today we cannot find out what was actually said. Because we need to know that when Denmark conducts foreign policy,” Kofod told Jyllands-Posten, who then spoke to Pape.

“My better half is from the Dominican Republic, so it was a great joy for me to get to know the country even better on a holiday trip, where we had the opportunity to visit people who could tell about the country. It was not an official visit, and those we met knew that very well,” he told the newspaper at the beginning of September.

But a week later, his tune changed: “As Ekstra Bladet and Jyllands-Posten have written, I have had meetings with politicians from the Dominican Republic. It is clear to me that I should not have met with those politicians without having previously informed and consulted with the Danish Foreign Service. I regret those meetings.”

My husbands has said things …
Via Facebook over the past week, Pape has addressed the series of “misunderstandings”, but it is not clear exactly what he is referring to (other than throwing his husband under the election bus), beyond his regret regarding the 2018 meetings.

“My husband has said things that are wrong, while other things are based on misunderstandings. This is information that I have also passed on, but in good faith,” he wrote on Facebook.

“I am sorry about that. There are also some meetings with politicians in the Dominican Republic that I shouldn’t have had. Of course I shouldn’t have done that. Of course I resent that. But now I want to move on, because there are also many things that need to happen in Denmark, and which are more important for the Danish population.”

Konservative held its AGM over the weekend where a large banner with a photo of Pape proclaimed him “Denmark’s next prime minister”. It’s optimistic, but should it come true, expect some big bumps along the way.

It is widely expected that an autumn general election could be called any day now.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”