436

Opinion

Mishra’s Mishmash: Focus on schools in pre-election campaigning
Mrutyuanjai Mishra

September 10th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

During the pandemic, primary school kids were forced into virtual learning and testing – if their exams weren’t cancelled altogether (photo: Pixabay)

Talk of a Danish general election is in the air. Everyone is waiting for PM Mette Frederiksen to declare a date so the ‘real campaigning’ can begin and voters can start making decisions about what they want from the country’s future. 

But instead, like everywhere else when elections are almost due, we’re caught up in a state of pre-election indirect campaigning limbo: and just like foreplay, with a climax guaranteed at the end, this will go on for as long as the woman in charge says it will. 

In need of fixing … again
The hot potato of this election’s indirect campaigning is the state of affairs at the country’s schools and educational institutions.

Young Danish children spend a huge amount of time at school. Once conventional classes stop in the early afternoon, most head to an institution connected to the school, where they often stay until five in the evening, up to their elbows in paper mache or playing indoor sport.

After all, Denmark has one of the highest frequencies of working women, so the schools are required to care for the children until the age of ten at their SFO after-school facilities. For tweens and young teens, the responsibility switches to the clubs, where pupils can stay long after school hours until they either go home or are picked up by their parents.

But SF, the socialist people’s party, has already made it their slogan that it wants to repair the damaged school system, where the working conditions for children are not optimal and they are unable to thrive socially.

Slipping through the net
The Danish schools require monetary assistance, and that has been a subject of political debate lately. MPs on both sides of the spectrum ask why the schools aren’t thriving in light of the political will to invest a huge share of the public purse – 7.8 percent of the GDP, compared to just between 4.2 and 5.4 percent in the likes of Italy, France, Spain and Germany – and willingness to constantly reform … even though the changes often end up disrupting progress. 

Large numbers of pupils, for example, continue to slip through the net, leaving school at the end of the ninth grade, just 16 and with no qualifications. Predominantly, they are boys who struggled with sitting quietly and learning to read and write to a high standard. 

Meanwhile, thousands of new jobs that require academic skills are going to people from abroad. Many Danes simply don’t have the know-how to undertake research-oriented, often lucrative jobs, which require several years of academic discipline – especially in the field of life sciences.

Understandable exodus
Improving discipline could be the answer. There is simply too much noise in the classrooms, making it almost impossible for most pupils to concentrate.

State education is witnessing a steady exodus of children from the public schools to private/international alternatives where the class sizes are far smaller and facilities much better. They get the same subsidies, after all, but then just add more funding to offer an improved service. At the majority of the international schools, the fees are among the cheapest in the whole of Europe, which is borderline bizarre when you consider Denmark’s overall cost of living.

The left-wing parties want to change this and are therefore fighting the election on making the nation’s public schools viable, reliable establishments where discipline has been restored and investment better placed. 

The opposition parties, meanwhile, want to privatise wherever they can, and this could mean more schools charging fees.

About

Mrutyuanjai Mishra

As a regular contributor to the Times of India, the country’s largest newspaper, Mishra is often sought-after by Danish media and academia to provide expertise on Asian-related matters, human rights issues and democratisation. He has spent half his life in India and the other half in Denmark and Sweden.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”