158

News

Government eyes use of genealogical research in criminal investigations

Christian Wenande
September 8th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Justice Ministry investigating possibilities following a citizenry proposal that has attracted over 50,000 signatures 

The police are charging a 32-year-old man for multiple felonies. (Flickr/Alan Cleaver)

You never know with citizenry proposals that gain the required 50,000 signatures to be discussed by the politicians.

Sometimes the government scoffs at them and other times they are briefly entertained before falling by the wayside. 

But not this one, it seems. 

A citizenry proposal relating to the police using genealogical research to solve serious crimes has spurred the government into action.

The Justice Ministry has asked the Rigspolitiet state police to look into the possibility of using genealogical research in murder and heinous crime investigations – and if possible to ensure that police begin using the technology as soon as possible in relevant cases.

“It’s very important that the police have the necessary tools to solve crimes like murder and rape,” said justice minister Mattias Tesfaye.

“Genealogical research can improve police investigation, but it also raises some significant legal questions that need to be addressed.”

READ ALSO: First foreign fighter convicted of treason

Helped snag the Golden State Killer
The ministry contends that employing genealogical research should require court order approval and the establishment of a state consent-based database where citizens in Denmark can voluntarily register their DNA.

The use of genealogical research in crime investigation involves the comparison analysis of an unidentified DNA profile with a search in the central DNA profile registry in a bid to find a match with someone in their family tree. 

This can enhance the chances of criminals being caught, as well as help solve cold cases stretching back years.

The technique is already being used in the US where dozens of cold cases – some from crimes committed decades ago –  have been solved.

Perhaps the most famous case is the one involving the Golden State Killer, Joseph DeAngelo, who was apprehended in 2018


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”