634

News

Wealthiest Danes are by far the worst CO2 emitters  

Christian Wenande
September 5th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

The top 1 percent emit ten times as much CO2 than the average Dane, according to new climate inequality report

There’s a huge difference when it comes to CO2 emitters (photo: Pixabay)

When it comes to CO2 emissions, the wealthiest in Denmark emit far more than their fair share compared to the rest of the population. 

According to the new World Inequality Report, the wealthiest 1 percent in Denmark emit ten times as much CO2 than the average person.

The report found that the top 1 percent on average emitted 93.1 tonnes of CO2 annually, while the average person emitted just 8.0 tonnes. 

Even the wealthiest 90-99 percent were far behind the top 1 percent group at 22.6 tonnes annually.

READ ALSO: Government unveils ambitious green tax reform

“A climate debt”
The lowest emitters were the poorest 10 percent, which emitted just 3.5 tonnes per year. 

In fact, the wealthiest 1 percent globally have a climate footprint that is the equivalent of that produced by three billion of the world’s poorest people. 

“It’s really important to be aware that the climate crisis we are experiencing is primarily created by wealthy people in rich countries, while it mostly impacts vulnerable people in the poorest countries,” Lars Koch, the secretary general of Oxfam Ibis, told DR Nyheder.

“We [the wealthiest countries] have a climate debt as it is us who have created the crisis. The climate change that is already happening demands that developing countries adapt while they sustain immense damage. Just look at Pakistan.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”