827

News

Copenhagen abandons 2025 CO2-neutrality goal

Christian Wenande
August 23rd, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Lofty aim no longer realistic as the ARC incinerator in Amager has given up applying for state funds for a carbon capture plant for its chimneys

It’s looking like a downhill trajectory for Copenhagen’s CO-2 neutrality bid (photo: BIG)

Back in 2009 when Copenhagen proudly unveiled its 2025 CO2-neutrality goal, the news went around the world.

PM Mette Frederiksen also used the ambitious target as a major talking point when the Danish capital hosted the C40 Climate Summit in 2019. 

But now the city has been forced to abandon its trailblazing goal.

According to city mayor Sophie Hæstorp Andersen, the aim is no longer realistic following the news that the ARC incinerator in Amager has given up applying for state funds for a carbon capture plant for its chimneys.

“It’s super unfortunate that we won’t reach the goal in 2025. I’m very sad about it. But it doesn’t mean we can’t get there in 2026, 2027 or 2028. So we still have a hope that we can succeed,” Andersen told DR Nyheder.

Andersen said that Copenhagen has reduced its CO2 emissions by 80 percent – above the 70 percent target for this year – but to attain full CO2-neutrality it would require the ARC incinerator to gain access to the state’s 8 billion kroner CCS slush fund.

READ ALSO: Copenhagen named world’s most sustainable city

Big plans scuppered
According to Energywatch.dk, ARC doesn’t have the necessary equity capital to do so.

ARC has been working on capturing CO2 for a while now – it already has a demo plant up and running, which has demonstrated an ability to capture CO2 emissions from its chimneys. 

And next year, a bigger plant is scheduled to be established. 

The plan was then to scale up even bigger in 2025 with a plant that can filter all CO2 out of emissions.

“They [the state] set some criteria to be able to gain access to the state funds to develop CO2 capture technology that they knew that the ARC waste plant in Copenhagen Municipality couldn’t live up to,” Line Barfoed, the city’s mayor for technical issues, told DR Nyheder.

“We thought we could breach the final stretch by capturing CO2 from the waste we still have to burn. We hadn’t imagined that the government wouldn’t be in on it.”

READ ALSO: Svaneke becomes Denmark’s first CO2-neutral brewery

New goal for 2035!
The government, meanwhile, has countered that other municipal plants – including Vestforbrændingen in Glostrup – have managed to qualify to gain access to the funds.

“When the state forks out such immense sums, it is standard procedure that some demands follow regarding the finances of the company involved,” Dan Jørgensen, the climate minister, wrote to DR Nyheder.

Despite the setback, Andersen is adamant that Copenhagen will get there in the end.

In a social media post, she presented a new vision that Copenhagen should contribute positively to climate calculations by 2035 at the latest.

“Does it suck? Yes, very much so. So I can promise you that we won’t sit on our hands. We will continue working. Because Copenhagen MUST be at the forefront of the climate agenda,” said Andersen.

“We shouldn’t just be climate-neutral. We need to be even more ambitious.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”