1289

Opinion

Union Views: Out of sight, out of mind – out of the loop?
Steen Vive 

July 24th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Go on! Get Amy involved! (photo: Pixabay)

Studies show that most workplace co-operations take place between colleagues who work near one another. We are less likely to involve colleagues whom we rarely see. We have a proximity bias.

A bias at tipping point
Proximity bias is when, consciously or unconsciously, we orientate ourselves towards the people who are physically near us. There might be a colleague in another department who would be a better choice to ask, but it doesn’t occur to us. We have a blind spot: a bias.

This is not a new discovery. But at a time when some of us are at the office while others work from home, it is as relevant as ever. 

There is a growing risk that we will staff our assignments ineffectively, without making best use of the available expertise, knowledge and skills.

Key passive face-time
Researchers point to two types of communication in the workplace.

There is ‘active face-time’, when we communicate in direct conversations and meetings – often in formal settings.

And there is ‘passive face-time’, when we give attention and recognition in spontaneous encounters – for example, when you say to someone, in passing: “Good morning – good to see you.”

It’s invaluable
Passive face-time is about being seen, met and recognised. Its effect on cohesive collaboration is invaluable.

When working from home, we do not meet others as often as we do in the office. We lose the passive face-time opportunities. 

So how do we compensate for this loss? How can we create passive face-time opportunities? See the factbox for a few suggestions.


Counter-measures:

Recognise the existence and risk of proximity bias, and talk about it.

Ensure everyone is involved at hybrid meetings. When you ask for input, start with the colleagues attending digitally.

Establish a framework for informal meetings, such as a virtual morning coffee every Friday.

Make an effort to stay in contact if you often work at a distance.

Use chat features or services to encourage informal communication.

Seek advice when you staff a task. Have you overlooked somebody who a colleague would definitely include?

About

Steen Vive 

Steen is senior advisor at Djøf, the Danish Association of Lawyers and Economists. He is a blogger and manager of various projects aimed at generating jobs in the private sector. In this column he writes about trends and tendencies in the labour market. Follow him on Twitter @SteenVive.  


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”