812

Opinion

Danish Capital in 2022: Time to revisit the implementation of Brexit
Neil Smith  

July 17th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

The piece fits however out of shape it might be (photo: Pixabay)

Like the inversion of Mike Campbell in Hemingway’s ‘The Sun Also Rises’, the United Kingdom ended at a Hard Brexit suddenly, and then gradually. The big bang was the vote six years ago, but that did not have to mean an absolutist clean break. That was instead the result of an accumulation of constant framing and tactical misjudgements.

May have been better
In early 2020, Theresa May tried to get a Brexit bill through Parliament several times. This included a backstop whereby Britain would not leave the customs union until an alternative arrangement for Northern Ireland was found. For all her limitations as a politician, May tried to sincerely grapple with this particular hot potato.

It was no surprise that May’s plan was rejected by Conservative hardliners, who see legal sovereignty in absolutist terms. More puzzling was that Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the SNP and Northern Irish unionists voted against it. May’s plan was not perfect by any means, but it kept alive the possibility of a softer Brexit.

Bo-Jo only so-so
With May unable to move the ball forward, her colleagues broke the emergency glass and replaced her with Boris Johnson, who decided that the country needed a clean break and “got Brexit done” by ignoring previous assurances to Northern Irish unionists, and agreeing to a regulatory border in the Irish sea. 

This is now creating entirely foreseeable (and foreseen) problems. By allowing Johnson in, the opposition parties ensured that they did not get the more practical Brexit they claimed they wanted.

Asleep at the wheel
This slice of modern history shows how indifference to Northern Ireland, goalposts being moved, poor opposition tactical decisions and an amorphous concept of sovereignty led the UK to sleepwalk into a full break with the EU. 

Other solutions, involving membership of the single market and/or the customs union, or a deeper relationship with the EU were not only possible, but far more aligned with what was promised during the campaign, in which the benefits of the single market were uncontentious.

Full effects on show now
Northern Ireland is at the forefront of the societal impact, but the rest of the UK is being hit too. With COVID on the retreat, we now have a better idea of the impact Brexit has caused. Trade with the EU has plummeted, investment is down, and studies show that Brexit has added to inflation. It is neither the time nor the place to relitigate the Brexit campaign. 

However, with discussions surrounding the Northern Irish protocol, the time is right to critique the implementation of Brexit, and wake up from this sleepwalking.

About

Neil Smith  

Neil is a Scottish-educated lawyer with 18 years’ experience in corporate structuring and general commercial matters. Based in Copenhagen, he primarily advises on international deals. Out of the office, his interests include sports and politics. His column explores topical international financial and economic issues from a Danish perspective.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”