584

News

It’s not the ’80s: new rules on the way for gay blood donors

Jared Paolino
June 23rd, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

A rule barring sexually active gay men from donating blood in Denmark has come under increased scrutiny, with a petition to change the policy gathering over 8,000 signatures

More gay men may soon be able to donate blood in Denmark (photo: Pixabay)

The Danish government is considering the nixing of a rule preventing men from donating blood if they have had sex with another man in the last four months

The rule, which has been criticized for its discriminatory effect on gay men, has existed since 2020. Previously, men who had been in same-sex relationships were prohibited from donating blood at all – a policy that was implemented in 1988 when the AIDs epidemic was at its peak.

By effectively excluding gay men in relationships from donating blood, the rule limits the available donor pool without any benefit to blood security, says Chris Amdisen, a doctor and gay man behind a citizens’ proposal to change the rule.

“I think the rules are discriminatory as they are today. They no longer make sense. My risk for these diseases as a gay man in a stable relationship is not higher than for many others,” said Amdisen to DR.

More donors, less blood shortages
Denmark has had a shortage of male blood donors in the past. In addition to the restrictions facing gay men, all blood donors must be able to read and speak Danish in order to ensure there are no misunderstandings between donors and the blood-collecting staff.

In addition, foreigners who do speak Danish must have lived in Denmark for a minimum of one year and be in possession of a Danish social security number.

Policymakers and experts have joined Amdisen in saying that lifting the restrictions on gay men may be a way to reduce the likelihood of shortages without compromising patient wellbeing. In fact, Styrelsen for Patientsikkerhed, the Danish agency for patient safety, said in a written statement this week “that it will probably be possible to relax the current rules.”

The agency asked Dansk Selskab for Klinisk Immunologi, the Danish Society for Clinical Immunology, “for a professional assessment of any risks.”

Risk of HIV infection is “extremely small”
According to DR, Dansk Selskab for Klinisk Immunologi has now completed its assessment, passing on its recommendation to the government that the rule be changed.

Christian Erikstrup is chief physician at Aarhus University and sits on the board of the Dansk Selskab For Klinisk Immunologi.  He cites declining HIV numbers and modern testing capabilities to back up the decision.

From 2008 to 2017, for example, there were an average of 122 new HIV cases among men, but that number had dropped to 58 new cases by 2021. In addition, current HIV tests are nearly 100 percent accurate.

According to Erikstrup, the risk of a recipient of donor blood being infected with HIV from a gay man will be “extremely small”.

Denmark in the middle of the pack
Denmark would not be the first European country to revise its rules for gay men donating blood. Last year, Germany eliminated a policy requiring gay and bisexual men to abstain from sex for a year before donating blood. In March of this year, France eliminated a similar policy requiring a four-month deferral period.

Nonetheless, a majority of European member states have maintained some manner of restriction on gay men donating blood.

For Chris Amdisen, the man whose petition has now garnered over 8,00 signatures in Denmark, the change that may soon be on the way in Denmark is an important victory.

“It makes me really happy, because it means that they have listened to my proposal and taken it seriously,” said Amdisen to DR. “There is hope that the outdated rules will be changed. I hope we can become a progressive country in this field.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”