703

News

Lynetteholm environmental impact projections based on 41-year-old research

Christian Wenande
April 26th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Greenlighting the dumping of sludge in Køge Bay was partly based on US report involving canal dredging from 1981 

Lynetteholmen’s financial plan has been declared unrealistic by the mayor of Copenhagen (photo: By & Havn)

Since January, hundreds of thousands of tonnes of sludge has been dumped into Køge Bay as part of the massive Lynetteholm artificial island construction project. 

The issue came to prominence after attracting heavy criticism from the Swedish government, among others. 

Despite that, the Danish authorities continue to maintain that the dumping doesn’t affect the sea environment in the bay – referring to the project’s environmental impact report.

But now national broadcaster DR has uncovered how the report is based on, among other things, a 41-year-old article from the US.

“It’s based on a number of assumptions for which there is no immediate evidence, so it resembles speculation,” Karen Timmermann, a DTU Aqua professor, told DR.

READ ALSO: Sweden wants Denmark to stop dumping toxic Lynetteholm sludge in Køge Bay

Sticking to their guns
Timmermann’s conclusion is backed by several other Danish experts and the authors of the original US report, which pertains to the environmental impact of canal dredging in a number of US estuaries.

Fred Lee, one of the researchers behind the report, underlined that their method would require thorough investigations of local conditions in Køge Bay to be used as evidence. 

“We don’t understand how the orgnisation behind this project has used our data to reach the conclusion there is no significant environmental impact,” Lee told DR.

Despite the news, city developer By & Havn maintains that its environmental impact report is sound and that this was the best calculation procedure.

To add insult to injury, a heavy grey residue recently began washing up in Copenhagen waterfront areas, much to the disdain of local residents.

Generated by the construction of the dams needed to complete the first phase of the building work, when sand comes into contact with water, By & Havn has confirmed the foam is not toxic.

Nevertheless, locals are adamant they will no longer bathe in their local designated area.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”