423

Opinion

Guest Opinion: Time to stop closing doors to transgender athletes and instead open our minds
Armelle Delmelle

April 24th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Gasp, horror! Lia Thomas is taller than some men too (photo: University of Pennsylvania)

Many people are asking “Do transgender women belong in sport?” 

Honestly, if it was only up to me, this question would not even be asked. 

A transgender woman is a woman and deserves a place in women’s sport like any other woman or girl. That is my opinion.  

More than muscles
I see you coming with your muscle ‘facts’. But did you know that the hormones taken by transgender women while transitioning make them lose muscular mass? 

So, can we maybe stop using that argument against people like Lia Thomas? She is not cheating. In fact, she had to wait a year into her hormone therapy to be able to compete again – and follow the rules.  

So, what if – and this might sound crazy – she is just good at what she does? What if her times were just the result of her years of training before and after the start of her transition in 2019? I think it is sad that we only talk about her wins because she is transgender.  

Hardly a worldbeater
Her latest triumph, at the time of writing, was the 500-yard freestyle at NCAA. She finished the race in 4:33.24, and critics called that ‘record threatening’. 

However, the current record was set in 2017 by Katie Ledecky who swam the distance in 4:25.06. You want facts, then here is a big one: she was almost nine seconds slower than the record. In other words, she was closer to being caught by her competitors than breaking any records. 

And if you look at her times before transitioning, she was much faster, so she has lost plenty of speed during the last three years.  

On the weekend of her win, Thomas took part in two other races: the 200 and 100 yards in which she finished fifth and eighth. This shows she has a lot of work to do before we can really say she is dominating women’s swimming.  

No reason to stop 
Her next goal, now that her university career is done, is to qualify for the 2024 Olympics in Paris. Some people think she should not be allowed, but I am going to tell you why I think she should at least try. 

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has allowed trans athletes to compete since 2004, but we had to wait until Tokyo 2021 to see some of them: New-Zealander weightlifter Laurel Hubbard was the first. 

In addition, the new rules set by the IOC do not even mention a maximum level of testosterone. The previously set level was to be under 10 nmol/L for a year – now what prevails is “health and bodily autonomy.” 

Today, the only thing that could keep her from officially going to the Olympics is if someone could provide scientific proof that she has an unfair advantage. Good luck with that.  

Closed minds destroying futures
Finally, when it comes to the ‘solution’ of creating a specific competition for trans people, I once again have to disagree. There is no real solution – especially when like me you consider there is no problem. Creating a specific competition might just end up creating more stigma and that is not what we want.   

I am a feminist – call me a witch if you want – but I do believe that feminism should include anyone who identifies as a woman, with no regard to colour, sexual orientation, or if they are trans or not. If women’s sport exists, then all women should be allowed to take part in it.  

So, to hell with those who say they do not have a place in sport, because they do. Representation matters. By supporting them, you support the kind of future in which your kids might see themselves. 

Would you like to tell them they can’t reach their goal because the gender they identify with is not the one on their ID card? Meditate on that.

About

Armelle Delmelle

Armelle was born and raised in Belgium in what she likes to say is a large family where everyone is given the same chances. In her free time, she reads or takes pictures (you can follow her on Instagram @armellespics). But mostly she enjoys her time with her growing family and friends. Over the years a few friends have come out to her. She has always believed that the best option for her is to be an ally or at least to try. That is why she keeps on learning about this kind of topic. There is always something new to learn and deconstruct; this is a neverending and empowering task.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”