523

Opinion

Union Views: The future of work is flexible
Steen Vive

April 2nd, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

“Clocking off at 12 again? Well, it’s Friday in Denmark” (photo: Pixabay)

In 1930 the British economist John M Keynes predicted that technological development, in time, would make us so much more productive that the working week would be reduced to 15 hours.

We are still not there. If his prophecy is to come true, there must be a fundamental change in the way we work.

Keynes’ prediction of technological development was accurate. Unfortunately, the ways in which we co-operate and organise work have not changed. With industrialisation, we began to count working hours. It became normal to arrive at factories and offices at fixed times of day, and still is. But society has changed, and we have technologies that enable us to change how we work.

COVID-19 disruption
COVID-19 was a disruptive force. It provided an opportunity to organise ourselves more flexibly. This is not merely a matter of whether we can work from home sometimes. Keep in mind that organisations structure themselves to address the tasks to be solved, and that a flexible organisation is not the same as a borderless organisation. 

The boundaries or necessities to be borne in mind when we organise ourselves will differ from company to company. The nature of the tasks may require some personnel to be in the office from nine o’clock until three, while others need not. Our jobs and functions differ, and the organisation must take this into account.

Let us experiment 
The pandemic enabled us to try out new structures and processes, including working from home. Our processes and tasks need not be reinvented. Instead, we should experiment on arranging ourselves. Making changes requires an experimental frame of mind with trials that run for short periods of time. Then we evaluate, adjust and experiment further.

We tend to fall back into the ways in which we have always done things. Otherwise, we would by now be working 15-hour weeks. But I expect that my kids, when they enter the job market in maybe 10 years’ time, will laugh at the thought that everyone in their parents’ generation set off for work at the same time, every single day …

About

Steen Vive

Steen is senior advisor at Djøf, the Danish Association of Lawyers and Economists. He is a blogger and manager of various projects aimed at generating jobs in the private sector. In this column he writes about trends and tendencies in the labour market. Follow him on Twitter @SteenVive.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”