1421

Things to do

Art Review: Louisiana’s 20th century woman tribute dripping in prescience

Ben Hamilton
March 18th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

★★★★★☆

She even designed cars (all photos: Louisiana)

The chronological staging of the ongoing Sonia Delaunay exhibition at Louisiana (which runs until June 12) profiling her contribution to 20th century art and fashion lends itself to highlighting the astounding prescience of her work.

In the same way important US playwrights like David Mamet have always been ten years ahead of the game, so too was Delaunay, an extraordinary visionary whose adult life more or less bookmarked the century.

The Russian-French artist’s colourful but blurred orange-sellers and flamenco dancers in the 1910s, painted in Spain where she was doing her best to distance herself from the horrors of WWI in her adopted homeland, are evocative of the decade to follow: the Roaring 20s.

Flamenco dancer slowly coming into focus

Through the way her work is presented in the exhibition, the decade to come is gradually coming into focus, and the curator should be applauded for that.

Overall, in this early part of the exhibition, you’re left with an overall visualisation of sound. After all, the silent movies of the time, which dominated the collective imagination and were influential on Delaunay’s work, did pretty much the same thing.

At the peak of her powers
In the 1920s, she enjoyed a true heyday at the absolute peak of her powers as her designs for ladies fashion did the talking, draped on the jet-setters of the time.

She herself remarked at the time: “If painting has entered daily life, it is because women wore it.” 

She basically wardrobed the Roaring 20s

But her designs get considerably more serious as we advance into the 1930s and the WWII – past one event, the Wall Street Crash, which Delaunay uncharacteristically didn’t see coming – to the extent you can almost hear the stomping jackboots. 

She survived the war and almost everything else that modern life threw at her, remaining relevant to her dying day in 1979, six years short of turning 100. 

A stunning tribute to a remarkable 20th century woman, this exhibition makes you feel smart – like the viewer of a sitcom who intimately knows the characters and can predict the outcome based on their tragic flaws.

But there’s no tragedy here: only the sense we’ve witnessed the life of an extraordinary artist who prevailed despite the patriarchy whilst enjoying every single minute.

The prolific artist at the desk she rarely left

Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”