371

Opinion

Guest Opinion: Let’s pledge to reboot a democratic Russia
David Munis Zepernick

March 9th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Residency rights of Ukrainian refugees are protected in Denmark and broader Europe. Photo: Lena Hunter

Once again war in Europe has the potential to overthrow the existing world order; naked Russian aggression has caught most, if not all, western leaders by surprise. Now, with the benefit of hindsight, we acknowledge that the signs were actually there, but we conveniently chose to ignore them believing we basically understood the rationale behind the actions of the Russian leader. We obviously didn´t.

Putin was also short-sighted
But President Putin obviously made some serious miscalculations too. He clearly did not anticipate the stiff Ukrainian resistance or the West´s united willingness to severely sanction Russia and support Ukraine with almost everything short of an article 5 commitment, which would be the equivalent of a declaration of war pitching Russia and NATO forces against each other.

He clearly did not foresee that his military aggression could push Sweden and perhaps even Finland into the open arms of NATO-membership, which would be contrary to Soviet/Russian foreign policy goals since NATO was established in 1949.

He clearly did not foresee the tectonic shift in German foreign and security policy announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who not only pulled the plug on the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which Putin hadn´t expected either, but also promised to invest 100 billion euros in a special fund to modernise the country’s military and boost annual defence spending annually to more than 2 percent of the GDP. 

What we can do as Europeans
I truly believe these measures are an appropriate and necessary response in the short run. If we desert Ukraine, we desert Europe. Putin has clearly demonstrated that the only language he respects is the language of military power. Putin has clearly crossed the point of no return and although international diplomacy is unpredictable, he will probably be considered a pariah of international politics for the remainder of his political life. 

The sad fact is, however, that European Union’s member states will not be able to build up a credible military deterrent anytime soon and, in any case, nuclear-armed Russia is not Serbia or Iraq where western (US) forces can realistically aspire to catch the dictator and bring him to trial.

To build up military capability takes time, and we don´t know for how long Ukraine will be able to keep up the fight – even with massive western military and financial support. For the time being, our strengths as Europeans lie elsewhere. The question we Europeans should ask ourselves is: how we, militarily impotent as we are, can actually influence – read shorten – the duration of the war and, as they seem to be inextricably linked, Putin´s presidency?

Appealing directly to the Russian people
One thing to consider in parallel with the sanctions and military and financial support for Ukraine, but before all these actions are actually carried out, could be to present the Russian people – not the Russian president – with a much better deal! 

In exchange for a stop to the war, a change of leadership and free elections, we could and should pledge to invest heavily in a new peaceful and democratic Russia. Despite about 20 years of Putin propaganda, the Russians are not all hardcore nationalists eager to re-enact the Cold War and with a narrow-minded focus on restoring ‘Russian glory’. The Russians are an oppressed people led by a kleptocratic dictator who has used brute force and swindling ways to castrate Russia’s democratic institution to stay in power.

To do so and send such a signal to the Russian people would indeed be a risky business, immensely expensive and no easy task.  We would effectively incentivise yet another Russian revolution with all the geopolitical uncertainties involved. We would have to diversify funding from national welfare, compromise other important political agendas and invest heavily in Russia to stabilise the country and firmly anchor democracy – not unlike the situation in post-WW2 West Germany.      

Listen to the Englishman in New York!
But it would be a very attractive alternative to war and massive rearmament and potentially the European Union’s finest hour. 

After all, war would be such an ignorant thing to do if the Russians love their children too, as the singer Sting pointed out in the 1980s when I was a teenager.

About

David Munis Zepernick

David Munis Zepernick is a European Parliament candidate for Radikale.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”