1506

News

Lenient law concerning sex with young teens finally overhauled in Denmark

Ben Hamilton
March 1st, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Sexual intercourse with a minor aged 12-14 will now be regarded as rape

A chink of light for children left in the dark by the old law (photo: Pixabay)

It’s a head-scratcher, alright. British readers might even go as far as asking whether Red Barnet, the Danish branch of Save the Children, is named after the marks left behind.

Until yesterday, sexual intercourse with a child aged 12, 13 or 14 was only classified as sex with a minor, carrying a maximum sentence of eight years in prison.

But in many cases, adult perpetrators have got off with a lenient sentence if they were able to demonstrate they had a meaningful relationship with the child.

Law was too lenient
Two years ago, for example, a 32-year-old male schoolteacher was sentenced to just two years for having a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl. 

The teacher was acquitted of rape on the grounds that the girl voluntarily acceded. Instead, he was convicted of assaulting a minor.

Sometimes they get off scot-free completely. “We have seen too many cases where adult perpetrators are acquitted of having abused children on the grounds that the child has participated voluntarily in a ‘boyfriend-like relationship’,” Red Barnet psychologist Ane Lemche told DR.

Now treated as rape
But from today, after unanimous backing from Parliament, sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 15 will be classified as rape – the same as sex with anyone under the age of 12.

The maximum sentence for such an offence is 12 years in prison and, importantly, it makes it absolutely illegal for a child aged 12-14 to consent to having sex with an adult.

However, should the perpetrator be under the age of 22, then the law is more lenient. 

Psychologist: children were blaming themselves
According to Lemche, the new law is long overdue.

“Children cannot give consent to sex with an adult, because they cannot see what it means to be sexually active with an adult, and it is extremely difficult for a child to say no,” she said.

“It is completely unreasonable to place that responsibility on a child when it comes to a sexual assault. The change in the criminal law makes it clear to the child that it is not the child’s fault, but the adult who has done something wrong.”

Other laws passed
The new bill passed by Parliament has also introduced a number of other laws.

Sex dolls of children have been banned, and more powers have been granted to the police to conduct secret searches in cases of child pornography.

Adults will face stiffer sentences for abusing children – an increase of 50 percent – and the authorities now have the power to confiscate the passport of anyone convicted of sexually abusing children. 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”