1023

News

Putin could detonate a nuclear weapon off the coast of Denmark as a show of strength, warns Moscow analyst

Ben Hamilton
February 28th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

A world leader impossible to predict, concurs BBC article that suggests Putin could resort to such actions should Russia buckle under economic sanctions

Putin has a fairly firm grip on the future of the world right now (photo: Фото пресс-службы Президента России)

Four years ago this week, western Europe was hit by the Beast from the East.

Today it finds itself in the firing line of a ‘Blast from the Past’, according to the BBC.

In an article published at approximately 3 am CET, the BBC warns that Russia could potentially detonate a nuclear weapon off the coast of Denmark to demonstrate its power.

Such an action would be devastating for Denmark and the other countries with shorelines bordering the North Sea, the northern part of the Atlantic Ocean.

READ MORE: How to help Ukraine in Denmark

Somewhere between Britain and Denmark
Since the early 1990s, Moscow-based Pavel Felgenhauer has been one of the world’s leading experts on Russia’s political and military leadership.

Over the weekend he told the BBC that Russian President Vladimir Putin is in a “tight spot” and that this could have terrible consequences for Denmark.

“He doesn’t have many options left, once the West freezes the assets of the Russian central bank and Russia’s financial system actually implodes. That will make the system unworkable,” he reasoned.

“One option for him is to cut gas supplies to Europe, hoping that will make the Europeans climb down. Another option is to explode a nuclear weapon somewhere over the North Sea between Britain and Denmark and see what happens.”

In such a situation, contends Felgenhauer, nobody from Putin’s inner circle would stand up against him.

Impossible to predict Putin
The BBC article, with the headline ‘Ukraine invasion: Would Putin press the nuclear button?’, does not make easy reading.

The author, uncharacteristically for such an article perhaps, starts the piece in the first person – it underlines the seriousness of its nature.

“Let me begin with an admission. So many times, I’ve thought: ‘Putin would never do this.’ Then he goes and does it,” he writes.

“‘He’d never annex Crimea, surely?’ He did. ‘He’d never start a war in the Donbas.’ He did. ‘He’d never launch a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.’ He has. I’ve concluded that the phrase ‘would never do’ doesn’t apply to Vladimir Putin. And that raises an uncomfortable question: ‘He’d never press the nuclear button first. Would he?'”

READ MORE: Ukraine’s ambassador to Denmark calls for help from both citizens and officials

Nuclear capability already on special alert
Over the weekend, Putin put his country’s nuclear forces on ‘special alert’, citing the aggressive tone of various NATO leaders.

Certainly, both the Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and foreign minister, Jeppe Kofod, have been particularly vocal in their condemnation of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which began on the morning of February 24.

As things stand, the outcome of the invasion is uncertain, as media reports suggest that Ukraine is standing up to the onslaught commendably. 

Meanwhile, NATO nations and others are busy imposing economic sanctions on Russia.

READ MORE: Denmark to close down airspace to Russian aircraft

World without Russia unthinkable to its leader
As the BBC article suggests, it’s hard to predict how Putin will react.

Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine, he said: “To anyone who would consider interfering from the outside – if you do, you will face consequences greater than any you have faced in history.”

And in a documentary in 2018, he appeared to suggest he would be happy for the world to cease to exist should Russia be phased out.

“If someone decides to annihilate Russia, we have the legal right to respond. Yes, it will be a catastrophe for humanity and for the world. But I’m a citizen of Russia and its head of state. Why do we need a world without Russia in it?” he said.

These are worrying times, indeed.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”