293

Business

Study: Men more sceptical about ESG investments than women

Armelle Delmelle
February 25th, 2022


This article is more than 2 years old.

Men tend to see a less optimistic future with ESG investments (photo: Pixabay)

Danske Bank unit Danske Invest recently conducted a study on investor preferences in Denmark, and the analysis revealed that women are more willing than men to sacrifice returns to uphold environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals.

In fact, 59 percent of men  were ready to invest in companies that ignored sustainability, provided they generated higher returns. Among women, the figure was 41 percent.

Despite that Denmark is one of the world’s greenest countries. Nevertheless, investors don’t seem ready to put their money in ESG assets.

It might be that they are conflicting with consumers’ concerns – especially since they are facing higher inflation and the geopolitical uncertainty triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Disclosing obligation
Europe’s revised Markets in Financial Instruments Directive requires that financial advisers ask their clients about their sustainability preferences.

This follows the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Requirement that entered into force in March 2021 in Europe. It forces the investment industry to document its ESG allocations.

ESG are underperforming
At the moment, ESG funds are underperforming. According to Bloomberg, the European ESG funds have lost an average of 8.9 percent this year. The survey shows that this outcome has less impact on women’s commitment to ESG.

“Men are generally more sceptical when it comes to sustainable investments,” said Natalia Setlak, a senior strategist at Danske Bank.

According to her, 23 percent of the men surveyed thought ESG had a “decidedly negative effect on returns”. Only 10 percent of women had the same view.

Investing in ESG shouldn’t involve a choice between sustainability and returns, Setlak said.

“There’s no reason to assume that companies with a strong profile within sustainability will perform worse in the future,” she added.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”