363

Things to do

Performance Review: Take five and figure it out a bit!

Ben Hamilton
September 7th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

★★★☆☆☆

It’s hard to resist the charm of Camilla Ruelykke Holst and Benjamin Buza (photo: Costin Radu)

It’s the voice. Booming. Majestic. Can’t see him, but he’s everywhere. Italian name, somehow familiar. He’ll go far, that kid.

The dancers come and go. Sure, metaphorically – it’s a tough business – but literally tonight, down a staircase from the left. 

Splits and repeated twirls from the gents, high-kicks and luscious curls from the ladies. But there are too many lifts, perhaps, and not enough grit.

It’s like a MGM film about gangsters and their malls: if only something would shock the blazers and frocks in the expensive seats, but it’s all too sanitised, like the world these songs would have us believe existed.

Rare highlights
Sure, the voice is everything … but it’s the show’s biggest constraint. Dancing to the well-known lyrics is too safe, like they’re just plodding along. The orchestra stays on track and so do the dancers. 

Only instrumentals allow them to breathe. The first half has one, the second half three, you do the maths.

The Take Five instrumental midway through the second half is a highlight – like it’s the product of some genuine collaboration between orchestra and dancers.

Percussion informs their steps, like they’re dancing to the beat, and the musicians feed off their energy. It’s the only time the music could legitimately be described as jazz.

Limited synchronicity
Camilla Ruelykke Holst and Benjamin Buza steal the show as the west end girl meets east end boy. 

Not only do they sizzle together, but they evolve, bringing believability and narrative to their story.

You almost root for them: she’s snooty, he’s melancholic, but something clicks. Holst emerges in the second act sexy as hell, while Buza broods a masculinity missing with the other dancers.

But really, it’s a cast of too many that offers limited synchronicity.

Even Idi Amin didn’t get a less deserved ovation than this.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”