258

News

European Court of Human Rights rules against Denmark in family reunification case

Ben Hamilton
July 9th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Decision to extend waiting from one to three years was backed by blue bloc with the help of the current government party Socialdemokratiet

She’s eating her cake today (photo: Inger Støjberg/Pixabay)

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has ruled that Denmark committed a major human rights violation in early 2016 when it lengthened the amount of time a newly-arrived refugee must wait until they can apply for family reunification.

Since then, refugees who receive temporary protection status have had to wait three years for the right to family reunification. Previously the required length of time was one year.

The case was initially started in 2016 by a Syrian doctor whose application to be reunited with his wife was turned down.

An almost unanimous decision
Today, 16 of the 17 judges at European Court of Human Rights voted in favour of the verdict, with just one abstaining. 

A statement read that Denmark had not found a “fair balance” between individual needs and its economic situation, and the court has ordered the Danish state to pay the Syrian doctor 10,000 euros in compensation.

Previously both the High Court and Supreme Court in Denmark had approved the law change – the latter in 2017. 

Another blow for Inger Støjberg
The family reunification law was one of many introduced by Inger Støjberg, the former minister for integration and immigration: number 27 of well over 100!

It was backed by her party, Venstre, as well as blue bloc allies Liberal Alliance, Konservative and Dansk Folkeparti.

Given its stringent immigration policies of late, it will surprise few that the current government party Socialdemokratiet also approved the law.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”