504

Things to do

CPH Jazz Festival: Touching bass with local talent

Lena Hunter
July 4th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Local bassist and composer Klaus Nørgaard talks us through his two, wildly different records, favourite jazz albums and biggest influences. Catch Nørgaard live with Jorge Rossy Trio at Gården og Gaden every afternoon from July 2-6, and at Mellemrummet on July 8

(photo: Emil Aagaard)

Copenhagen double-bassist and composer Klaus Nørgaard recorded both his self-published albums, ‘Village Life’ (2018) and ‘Clarinet’ (2020), inside a one-block radius in Nørrebro. 

They are, in differing ways, hyper-local productions – highly personal compositions produced in his own home and local wine bar. 

Nørgaard has also featured on Søren Dahl Jeppesen’s albums ‘Route One’ (2009), ‘Red Sky’ (2001) and ‘Pipe Dreams’ (2013), Elou Elan’s ‘All That Turns’ (2012), and Niels Lyhne Løkkegaard’s ‘Sikorski’ (2013), amongst others.

In Copenhagen and beyond, he has played with the Jorge Rossy Trio, The Soft Trio and Aaron Parks Trio, and is the bandleader and composer for Tropic Minor.

But Nørgaard’s formative training was in New York with esteemed American bassist Ben Street. Accordingly, his sound melds old-school American tradition with contemporary Scandinavian jazz sensibilities.

Music in movement
Nørgaard’s first record, Village Life, is in his own words “rooted in the golden age of jazz in the 1950s and 60s, but equally firmly grounded in [his] contemporary life”. 

With a nod to Ellington’s playful exoticism, the composition is warm and many-layered. Tonally, it oscillates between rich textures and tranquil, muted interludes, with each instrument being afforded both frenetic and thoughtful moments.

Following its release, All About Jazz noted the record’s particular lyricism: “His music is in movement and the poetic quality of his tunes is balanced by a cool sense of swing.” 

Though the atmosphere is sweetly hypnagogic, ‘Village Life’ owes its sense of intimacy to more than light hands. 

Nørgaard is joined by “local musicians, friends and long-time collaborators from afar” on sax, drums, vibraphone, trombone and vocals. Whether by cause or effect, this esprit de corps imbues the sound with a tangible expression of amity and harmony.

“If Sisyphus were to pick up the clarinet”
But hang tight: what followed Village Life was a total stylistic departure. Clarinet, recorded in Nørgaard’s own tiny apartment, is built up by a single clarinet voice, repeatedly overdubbed. 

“This is not the music of the village, but of the recluse,” says Nørgaard. Neither does the record draw on American jazz traditions – Clarinet is instead founded on “a specific way of relating to the present”.

“There are no breaks, rhythms, or harmonic developments in any classical sense. Just constant retakes, none of them exactly the same as the previous one, all of them slowly building up an ever-changing present,” he explains.

“This is what it might sound like if Sisyphus were to pick up the clarinet.” Certainly, if Village Life is a late-afternoon stroll through the square, the cerebral Clarinet is the rolling of an immense boulder up a hill.

Though strikingly polar, the disparities encompassed by Clarinet and Village Life are all contained in Nørgaard himself. 

Taken together they illustrate a perspective on jazz that is both philosophical and introspective, both freewheeling and referential. 


Whose style are you influenced by?

As a composer my biggest influences are Duke Ellington, Jobim, Joe Zawinul, and a lot of folklore from Africa and Latin America. As a bass player they are Wilbur Ware, Charles Mingus and Ron Carter. But the guy who turned me on to them was my first real teacher, Ben Street.

What did you do to develop your sound?

Lots of manual labour on the bass and ear training. Also reading and listening widely. Studying jazz, along with the cultural and racial history behind.

What new departures in jazz do you think are most interesting?

One of my favourite recent jazz albums (parts of it anyway) is Kurt Rosenwinkel’s Caipi.

What non-musical sources do you look to for inspiration?

I take a lot from books. Specifically classic literature and philosophy.

What’s your favourite jazz album?

Probably Afro Bossa or Indigos by Duke Ellington … Or in fact any Duke album.

 

Check out our complete CPH Jazz Festival guide here

 


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”