258

News

Danish-based Serbian playwright wins prestigious Reumert theatre award

Ben Hamilton
June 9th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Tanja Mastilo, the resident dramatist at the Why Not Theatre Company, walks off with the prize for ‘Årets dramatiker’ for her work on ‘The Cheyenne Are Leaving’, a powerful play staged last autumn

It was all smiles for Tanya Mastilo (right) and also Sue Hansen-Styles, the artistic director and co-founder of Why Not Theatre Company (photo: Hasse Ferrold)

The Danish-based Serbian dramatist Tanja Mastilo, the resident playwright at the Why Not Theatre Company, has won a prestigious Reumert – Denmark’s top theatre prize.

She, and her Why Not Theatre colleagues, recently attended the Reumert Awards of the Year show in Odense, where she was surprised to be confirmed at the ‘Playwright of the Year’ (‘Årets dramatiker’) for her work on ‘The Cheyenne Are Leaving’, a powerful play staged last autumn.

“We are over the moon, overwhelmed and a little bit hungover!” revealed the theatre’s Facebook page following the victory.

READ MORE: Reumert nomination for Why Not Theatre Company’s resident playwright

Jury: it was brilliant!
As is the case with all the Reumert awards, which this year also included a prize for Esben Smed for Best Actor for his work on the Royal Danish Theatre production of ‘Hamlet’, the jury provided its reasoning behind its selection.

“Tanja Mastilo’s psychological chamber play in English is steaming with disturbing, intense presence when a young desperado on the run from a civil war calls in on an elderly writer in a barricaded tower block,” it applauded. 

“Raw and poetic lines grow into a refugee nightmare, peeling back the skin of civilization to reveal a bleeding humanity beneath. Brilliant!”

Humbled by the praise
Mastilo was herself humbled by the praise, she told CPH POST last night.

“It felt very surreal and totally overwhelming. It still does! I’m so humbled by the fact that this text was noticed and appreciated and, as happy as I am to receive the award, I’m even happier that it’s for this text,” she said.

“I really poured a lot of myself and my feelings into this text, so for that to be acknowledged and awarded, it’s very gratifying,” she said. 

Not really a corona evening!
Recent award shows have been something of a damp squib due to corona, but Mastilo was impressed by the effort of the organisers.

“The ceremony itself was lovely and I thought very well organised: beside the fact that you had to show your corona pass and that half of the seats were empty, you couldn’t really tell that this was a ‘corona evening’,” she said.

“I think people were just happy to be together, dressed up and to celebrate – for a change!”

Critics like sheep
Despite the award, it is a mystery why the critics were not praiseworthy of the play when it was staged last autumn, given that the acting and production values were top notch throughout. 

Bar CPH POST and Scenekanten, which gave the play six out of six stars, the vast majority only gave it four, suggesting there is a sheep mentality among reviewers.

XQ28, Frederiksborgs Amts Avis, CPHCulture, Kulturtid, Kulturkupeen, Morten Hede/JP and POV International all gave it four, while most mainstream newspapers ignored it. Fortunately the Reumert jury took a different opinion.

READ MORE: Theatre Review: Far from leaving with the Cheyenne, we waited with Sitting Bull wanting more

Third Anglo theatre triumph this century
Anglophone actors and writers are rarely nominated for Reumerts, but there have been a few successes over the years. 

Actor Benjamin Stender won Best Newcomer for ‘The Woman in Black’ (That Theatre) in 2013, while British director Barry McKenna was part of the team who won the ‘Stor lille forestilling’ award for ‘Flammens Muse’ in 2008. 

Mastilo saw off competition from Line Knutzon, the writer of ‘Livstidsgæsterne’ (Betty Nansen Teatret), and Andreas Dawe, who created ‘Forræder’ (Randers Teater).

Praise has meanwhile been flooding in from other Anglophone theatre groups including London Toast Theatre, That Theatre Company, HIT International and the Copenhagen Theatre Circle.

Echoes of the 1981 Oscars: The Cheyenne are coming! (photo: Aleksandar S Mastilo)


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”