233

News

Will CO2 tax force foreign-owned companies in Denmark to go green or go home?

Lena Hunter
May 27th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

A proposed tax increase on CO2 emissions would light a fire under Denmark’s biggest polluters

62 percent of Denmark’s biggest industry polluters are EU-owned companies who are exempt from Danish CO2 tax (photo: Pixabay)

Cement giant Aalborg Portland is Italian-owned. An Irish company owns Holmegaard’s glass factory. Four brickworks in Southern Jylland, Fyn, Helsinge and Thy have been acquired by the Austrian group Wienerberger.

What’s the red thread between these companies? Huge CO2 emissions – amongst the largest in Denmark. But they are no anomalies.

Some 62 percent of the industry’s CO2 pollution in Denmark comes from foreign-owned companies whose emissions are covered by free EU quotas, according to a DR report using figures from the EU Commission and the Danish Energy Agency.

For one the EU’s most climate-conscious countries, it’s a stain on the green agenda. So what’s Denmark’s move?

Achilles Heel for Danish climate goals
The government is under pressure to raise the tax on CO2 emissions. Konservative, Venstre and Radikale, as well as the Climate Council and the Economic Council, have voiced concerns that private companies are getting away with polluting at little cost.

Jakob Roland Munch, an economics professor at the University of Copenhagen, supports the proposal – but predicts that it may harm business interests.

“For foreign-owned companies, it will probably be easier to move their production out of Denmark if a higher CO2 tax is introduced,” he said.

Henrik Dietrichsen is the managing director of Egernsund Wienerberger’s branch in the Nordic region. Wienerberger is one of Denmark’s biggest polluters, producing 37,000 tonnes of CO2 last year.

Dietrichsen echoed Munch’s concerns about the future viability of operating in Denmark under heavier taxation. “If there is a CO2 tax in Denmark, as proposed, and not in other countries, then of course it will have consequences for jobs.”

“The polluter should pay”
In the autumn, an expert group will present the first proposal on a green tax reform to raise the CO2 tax in Denmark and cover the industries exempt today.

Today, companies pay 180 kroner per tonne of CO2 – but the largest CO2 emitters like Wienerberger are exempt from Danish CO2 tax. The proposed increase will see a tonne of greenhouse gas cost 1,500 kroner.

“The polluter should pay. That is the principle we believe is healthy,” said Munch.

The tax minister, Morten Bødskov – though supportive of the increase – has been coy about hard figures. “How much exactly the increase will be is a question we have left to an expert group,” he said.

Subsidies for green alternatives
Meanwhile, 6 billion kroner has been set aside to support the companies’ green transition, should they choose to go green rather than go home.

“We want to help the industry get on the green track and avoid being taxed as a result of too many CO2 emissions,” said Bødskov.

Several of Denmark’s neighbours, such as Germany, Sweden and Norway, have already introduced a higher tax on CO2 or plan to do so.

While Denmark’s current tax-per-tonne is 180 kroner, Germany’s is 450 and Sweden’s 85, while Norway has raised tax to 1,500, according to Mikael Skou Andersen of Aarhus University.

For once it seems like it is time for Denmark to follow suit rather than lead the charge on the climate agenda.

“It will be easier to introduce a higher CO2 tax in Denmark when other countries are doing the same. We will not have to worry so much about production moving out,” assured Munch.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”