425

News

Mayors join forces against Lynetteholmen mega-project

Arzia Tivany Wargadiredja
May 25th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Heads of 14 municipalities cannot see why their constituents should foot the bill for development in the city centre

New island, new district … and new criticism (Photo: København Kommune)

Over a dozen mayors from municipalities around the capital have joined forces to protest against the government’s ambitious Lynetteholmen Island plan – a proposed new city district in Copenhagen Harbour, which is scheduled to be completed by 2070.

The 14 mayors expressed concerns that the residents in their municipalities will have to foot part of the bill for the development of the artificial island.

“It’s simply not fair,” Michael Ziegler, the mayor of Høje-Taastrup Municipality, told TV2 News.

“I also undertake urban development in Høje-Taastrup, but I do not send the bill to the city of Copenhagen.”

The mayors agree it is good that Copenhagen develops, especially when the capital is experiencing a housing crisis.

But they contend it is the owner of the project, in this case By & Havn, which should pay for it.

READ ALSO: Copenhagen to get new district on massive artificial island

Housing and flood barrier
Lynetteholmen will be built on an artificial island in the City Harbour in the area north of Refshaleøen and south of Nordhavn. 

It is expected that the majority of Parliament will pass a bill that will let By & Havn kick-off its mega-project deal in September.

The government expects the project to be completed by 2070 as a 2.8 sq km district inhabited by 35,000 people.

Aside from providing the capital with much-needed housing, Lynetteholm will also protect the coastal area of Copenhagen from possible storm flooding.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”