207

News

Danish jewellery giant distancing itself from mined diamonds

Christian Wenande
May 6th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

Going forward, Pandora will only be selling a lab-produced version of the gemstone as part of its collection

Diamonds are forever … and for everyone! (photo: Pixabay)

In the future, customers purchasing Pandora jewellery won’t need to be concerned about where or how the company is sourcing its diamonds.

In a bid to reduce costs and become more sustainable, the Danish giant will only use lab-produced diamonds in its products going forward.

“It’s a new collection of beautifully designed jewellery featuring lab-created diamonds,” said the CEO of Pandora, Alexander Lacik.

“They are as much a symbol of innovation and progress as they are of enduring beauty and stand as a testament to our ongoing and ambitious sustainability agenda. Diamonds are not only forever, but for everyone.”

A lab can produce a diamond in less than a month, while natural diamonds take one to three billion years to form.

READ ALSO: Svaneke becomes Denmark’s first CO2-neutral brewery

UK gets first dibs
Pandora also revealed that the price of lab-made diamonds has fallen in recent years, and that it is now a viable market.

The company has set a goal to be CO2-neutral by 2025, and the shift away from natural diamonds is part of that ambition.

Currently, Pandora’s diamonds are produced with 60 percent green energy, but the company expects that to be 100 percent next year.

Plans are already afoot to launch its first lab-produced diamond collection, Pandora Brilliance, in the UK.

According to the Gemological Institute of America, diamonds can be artificially produced using two methods: High-Pressure, High-Temperature (HPHT) and Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD).


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”