427

News

Post-Brexit blues: British expat re-enfranchisement comes with a sting in the tail

Lena Hunter
April 9th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

However, return of voting rights could cause severe inheritance tax complications, warns leading consultancy

London, United Kingdom. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak holds up the red box outside Number 11. Credit: Harriet Pavey / Flickr

UK Chancellor Rishi Sunak’s 2021 budget last week confirmed that British citizens living abroad, who are not residents of the UK for tax purposes, can qualify to vote on an “indefinite basis” in future UK elections.

For British expats who have long been lobbying to change a 2002 law specifying that only non-residents who have lived overseas for less than 15 years are eligible, this is good news.

But the law change also includes a significant sting in the tail that could have far-reaching consequences.

Liable for treasury tax take
Speaking to the Financial Times, Robert Salter, the associate director of the British financial advisory firm Blick Rothenberg, advises caution.

“British expats overseas should consider carefully whether they wish to take advantage of this extended franchise because it could cause problems in the future and mean they are liable for UK taxes and in particular inheritance tax,” he warned.

“Wealthier expats”, who may have moved overseas to minimise their UK tax exposure, are most at risk, he said.

“Anybody who is UK domiciled in accordance with our common law, will – on death – be subject to UK Inheritance Tax on their worldwide assets,” he continued.

“Even when one has lived overseas for many years, ongoing links to the UK (such as remaining registered to vote in the UK), may be a sign that one has retained a UK domicile and hence remain liable to UK IHT on death.”

“Serious impact”
It can get even more complicated, warns John Westwood, the managing director at Blacktower Financial Management, should expats return home under unplanned circumstances.

“The IHT ramifications may cause serious impact. This is yet another complex tax consideration that requires deep understanding and to be factored into your long-term financial planning,” he told CPH POST.

The changes won’t be a big problem for expats with limited assets, or for those who maintain links to the UK with the clear intention of retiring there in due course.

However, Salter said that “for others, it could make a major difference to the funds that they are able to pass on to their children and grandchildren.”


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”