2250

News

Denmark muted forever? Left-wingers’ win in Greenlandic election could be telling for island’s future independence

Ben Hamilton
April 7th, 2021


This article is more than 3 years old.

But with just over a third of the votes, Inuit Ataqatigiit will need to secure over half of the mandates. Lengthy negotiations look likely

Múte Inequnaaluk Bourup Egede. Take note of the name. Because this young man’s party,  Inuit Ataqatigiit (IA), has just won the Greenlandic elections.

Should the 34-year-old become the premier, he could prove to be a thorn in the side of Mette Frederiksen’s government, as his party’s socialist politics suggests he might prove to be an outspoken opponent of Danish policy regarding the island, as well as a fierce proponent of full independence. 

The irony of his christian name will be commented upon more than once.

Parties in negotiations
However, nothing is assured, as IA only won 36.6 percent of the vote, compared to 29.4 percent for Siumut, the ruling party. 

The leaders of all the parties will now negotiate over the next couple of days – namely to see if IA is able to form a government. Its best bet, according to the Sermitsiaq newspaper, is the centrist party Naleraq, which received 12 percent of the vote.

Tellingly, perhaps, IA won the vast majority of votes available in southern Greenland, whose controversial mining project, Kvanefjeldet, proved to be one of the biggest talking points of the election. Naleraq was also opposed to Kvanefjeldet. 

Mine a telling factor
An estimated 15-20 percent of the world’s need for rare earths can be found in Kvanefjeldet, which is expected to create over 700 jobs and annually raise 1.5 billion kroner over the 37 years it will be in operation.

However, the likes of IA and Naleraq fear the mine will have a harmful environmental effect on their homeland.

Again ironically, the money from the mine could aid the left-wingers’ overall aim to become independent. 

But is Siumut beaten?
Certainly, Siumut does not sound beaten, as IA will need to secure 16 of the 31 mandates up for grabs in the Naalakkersiusut parliament. 

Its chair Erik Jensen, who blamed Kvanefjeldet for his party’s poor showing, congratulated Egede on the victory, but added: “Now we are excited about what the negotiations will bring in the coming days.”

Whatever happens, this should be the end of the road for premier Kim Kielsen, who lost his chairmanship of Siumut late last year, but continued to lead his country.

IA previously led the government from 2009 to 2013 – the only period since the 1970s when Siumut has not been in charge.


Share

Most popular

Subscribe to our newsletter

Sign up to receive The Daily Post

















Latest Podcast

A survey carried out by Megafon for TV2 has found that 71 percent of parents have handed over children to daycare in spite of them being sick.

Moreover, 21 percent of those surveyed admitted to medicating their kids with paracetamol, such as Panodil, before sending them to school.

The FOLA parents’ organisation is shocked by the findings.

“I think it is absolutely crazy. It simply cannot be that a child goes to school sick and plays with lots of other children. Then we are faced with the fact that they will infect the whole institution,” said FOLA chair Signe Nielsen.

Pill pushers
At the Børnehuset daycare institution in Silkeborg a meeting was called where parents were implored not to bring their sick children to school.

At Børnehuset there are fears that parents prefer to pack their kids off with a pill without informing teachers.

“We occasionally have children who that they have had a pill for breakfast,” said headteacher Susanne Bødker. “You might think that it is a Panodil more than a vitamin pill, if it is a child who has just been sick, for example.”

Parents sick and tired
Parents, when confronted, often cite pressure at work as a reason for not being able to stay at home with their children.

Many declare that they simply cannot take another day off, as they are afraid of being fired.

Allan Randrup Thomsen, a professor of virology at KU, has heavily criticised the parents’ actions, describing the current situation as a “vicious circle”.

“It promotes the spread of viruses, and it adds momentum to a cycle where parents are pressured by high levels of sick-leave. If they then choose to send the children to daycare while they are still recovering, they keep the epidemic going in daycares, and this in turn puts a greater burden on the parents.”